Ethical Dilemmas in Using AI for Academic Writing and an Example Framework for Peer Review in Nephrology Academia: A Narrative Review
-
Published:2023-12-30
Issue:1
Volume:14
Page:89-105
-
ISSN:2039-7283
-
Container-title:Clinics and Practice
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Clinics and Practice
Author:
Miao Jing1ORCID, Thongprayoon Charat1, Suppadungsuk Supawadee12, Garcia Valencia Oscar A.1ORCID, Qureshi Fawad1ORCID, Cheungpasitporn Wisit1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA 2. Chakri Naruebodindra Medical Institute, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bang Phli 10540, Samut Prakan, Thailand
Abstract
The emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) has greatly propelled progress across various sectors including the field of nephrology academia. However, this advancement has also given rise to ethical challenges, notably in scholarly writing. AI’s capacity to automate labor-intensive tasks like literature reviews and data analysis has created opportunities for unethical practices, with scholars incorporating AI-generated text into their manuscripts, potentially undermining academic integrity. This situation gives rise to a range of ethical dilemmas that not only question the authenticity of contemporary academic endeavors but also challenge the credibility of the peer-review process and the integrity of editorial oversight. Instances of this misconduct are highlighted, spanning from lesser-known journals to reputable ones, and even infiltrating graduate theses and grant applications. This subtle AI intrusion hints at a systemic vulnerability within the academic publishing domain, exacerbated by the publish-or-perish mentality. The solutions aimed at mitigating the unethical employment of AI in academia include the adoption of sophisticated AI-driven plagiarism detection systems, a robust augmentation of the peer-review process with an “AI scrutiny” phase, comprehensive training for academics on ethical AI usage, and the promotion of a culture of transparency that acknowledges AI’s role in research. This review underscores the pressing need for collaborative efforts among academic nephrology institutions to foster an environment of ethical AI application, thus preserving the esteemed academic integrity in the face of rapid technological advancements. It also makes a plea for rigorous research to assess the extent of AI’s involvement in the academic literature, evaluate the effectiveness of AI-enhanced plagiarism detection tools, and understand the long-term consequences of AI utilization on academic integrity. An example framework has been proposed to outline a comprehensive approach to integrating AI into Nephrology academic writing and peer review. Using proactive initiatives and rigorous evaluations, a harmonious environment that harnesses AI’s capabilities while upholding stringent academic standards can be envisioned.
Reference82 articles.
1. Moshawrab, M., Adda, M., Bouzouane, A., Ibrahim, H., and Raad, A. (2023). Reviewing Federated Machine Learning and Its Use in Diseases Prediction. Sensors, 23. 2. Clinician Trust in Artificial Intelligence: What is Known and How Trust Can Be Facilitated;Rojas;Crit. Care Clin.,2023 3. Boukherouaa, E.B., Shabsigh, M.G., AlAjmi, K., Deodoro, J., Farias, A., Iskender, E.S., Mirestean, M.A.T., and Ravikumar, R. (2021). Powering the Digital Economy: Opportunities and Risks of Artificial Intelligence in Finance, International Monetary Fund (IMF eLIBRARY). 4. Gülen, K. (2022, December 29). A Match Made in Transportation Heaven: AI and Self-Driving Cars. Available online: https://dataconomy.com/2022/12/28/artificial-intelligence-and-self-driving/. 5. Frąckiewicz, M. (2023, June 24). The Future of AI in Entertainment. Available online: https://ts2.space/en/the-future-of-ai-in-entertainment/.
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|