The Impact of the Test Dissociation on the Binocular Balance of Children

Author:

Ibrahimi Danjela12ORCID,Aviles Marcos1ORCID,Rodríguez-Reséndiz Juvenal1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Engineering, Autonomous University of Querétaro, Santiago de Querétaro 76010, Mexico

2. Faculty of Medicine, Autonomous University of Querétaro, Santiago de Querétaro 76176, Mexico

Abstract

Purpose: this research compared the dissociated phoria at near and distance fixation in free space using the Howell test, alternate Cover test, and Thorington test. Methods: 220 healthy Mexican children (mean age 8.3±2.5 years) participated in this study. Phorias were quantified at both distances using each test, from the least to the most disruptive. The stereopsis degree and near point of convergence (break/recovery) were analyzed to understand their role in the visual system’s sensorimotor balance. Results: statistically significant differences were found among techniques, with a higher congruence for the EF. However, only the Howell and Thorington tests can be interchanged. The break value and near exophoria relate to each other and affect the stereopsis degree, whereas age is associated with the stereopsis degree and break value. Conclusions: the three techniques cannot be interchanged except for the Howell and Thorington test for the EF at far. The differences in the mode of dissociation could relate to the results.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Medicine

Reference31 articles.

1. Padula, W.V. (2012). Neuro-Visual Processing Rehabilitation, Optometric Extension Program Foundation.

2. Birnbaum, M.H. (1993). Optometric Management of Nearpoint Vision Disorder, Butterworth-Heinemann. [2nd ed.].

3. Griffin, J., Borsting, E., and Foundation, O.E.P. (2010). Binocular Anomalies: Theory, Testing & Therapy, OEP Foundation.

4. Scheiman, M., and Wick, B. (2020). Clinical Management of Binocular Vision: Heterophoric, Accommodative, and Eye Movement Disorders, Wolters Kluwer Health.

5. Visual and binocular status in elementary school children with a reading problem;Christian;J. Optom.,2018

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3