Affiliation:
1. Centre for Decision Making Uncertainty, University College London, London WC1H 0PY, UK
2. Department of Computer Science, University College London, London WC1 0PY, UK
3. Volterra Partners LLP, London SW9 6DE, UK
4. College of Emerging and Collaborative Studies, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA
Abstract
The literature on the fall of civilizations spans from the archaeology of early state societies to the history of the 20th century. Explanations for the fall of civilizations abound, from general extrinsic causes (drought, warfare) to general intrinsic causes (intergroup competition, socioeconomic inequality, collapse of trade networks) and combinations of these, to case-specific explanations for the specific demise of early state societies. Here, we focus on ancient civilizations, which archaeologists typically define by a set of characteristics including hierarchical organization, standardization of specialized knowledge, occupation and technologies, and hierarchical exchange networks and settlements. We take a general approach, with a model suggesting that state societies arise and dissolve through the same processes of innovation. Drawing on the field of cumulative cultural evolution, we demonstrate a model that replicates the essence of a civilization’s rise and fall, in which agents at various scales—individuals, households, specialist communities, polities—copy each other in an unbiased manner but with varying degrees of institutional memory, invention rate, and propensity to copy locally versus globally. The results, which produce an increasingly extreme hierarchy of success among agents, suggest that civilizations become increasingly vulnerable to even small increases in propensity to copy locally.
Subject
General Physics and Astronomy
Reference61 articles.
1. Fukuyama, F. (2009). The Origins of Political Order: From Prehuman Times to the French Revolution, Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
2. Morris, I. (2015). Foragers, Farmers, and Fossil Fuels: How Human Values Evolve, Princeton University Press.
3. On the nature of cultural transmission networks;Henrich;Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B,2011
4. Greater post-Neolithic wealth disparities in Eurasia than in North America and Mesoamerica;Kohler;Nature,2017
5. Schneidel, W. (2018). The Great Leveler: Violence and the History of Inequality from the Stone Age to the Twenty-First Century, Princeton University Press.