Tracheostomy Timing and Outcome in Severe COVID-19: The WeanTrach Multicenter Study

Author:

Battaglini DeniseORCID,Missale FrancescoORCID,Schiavetti IreneORCID,Filauro MartaORCID,Iannuzzi Francesca,Ascoli AlessandroORCID,Bertazzoli Alberto,Pascucci Federico,Grasso Salvatore,Murgolo Francesco,Binda Simone,Maraggia Davide,Montrucchio GiorgiaORCID,Sales GabrieleORCID,Pascarella GiuseppeORCID,Agrò Felice Eugenio,Faccio Gaia,Ferraris Sandra,Spadaro SavinoORCID,Falò Giulia,Mereto Nadia,Uva Alessandro,Maugeri Jessica Giuseppina,Agrippino BellissimaORCID,Vargas Maria,Servillo Giuseppe,Robba Chiara,Ball Lorenzo,Mora Francesco,Signori AlessioORCID,Torres AntoniORCID,Giacobbe Daniele RobertoORCID,Vena AntonioORCID,Bassetti Matteo,Peretti Giorgio,Rocco Patricia R. M.ORCID,Pelosi Paolo

Abstract

Background: Tracheostomy can be performed safely in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, little is known about the optimal timing, effects on outcome, and complications. Methods: A multicenter, retrospective, observational study. This study included 153 tracheostomized COVID-19 patients from 11 intensive care units (ICUs). The primary endpoint was the median time to tracheostomy in critically ill COVID-19 patients. Secondary endpoints were survival rate, length of ICU stay, and post-tracheostomy complications, stratified by tracheostomy timing (early versus late) and technique (surgical versus percutaneous). Results: The median time to tracheostomy was 15 (1–64) days. There was no significant difference in survival between critically ill COVID-19 patients who received tracheostomy before versus after day 15, nor between surgical and percutaneous techniques. ICU length of stay was shorter with early compared to late tracheostomy (p < 0.001) and percutaneous compared to surgical tracheostomy (p = 0.050). The rate of lower respiratory tract infections was higher with surgical versus percutaneous technique (p = 0.007). Conclusions: Among critically ill patients with COVID-19, neither early nor percutaneous tracheostomy improved outcomes, but did shorten ICU stay. Infectious complications were less frequent with percutaneous than surgical tracheostomy.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3