Characterization of a Novel Approach for Neonatal Hematocrit Screening Based on Penetration Velocity in Lateral Flow Test Strip

Author:

Zucchini Lorenzo1,Ajčević Miloš1ORCID,Coda Zabetta Carlos Daniel2,Greco Chiara2,Fernetti Cristina2,Moretto Carlo3,Pennini Simone3,Accardo Agostino1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Engineering and Architecture, University of Trieste, 34127 Trieste, Italy

2. Bilimetrix s.r.l., 34149 Trieste, Italy

3. Prodigys Technology s.r.l., 34149 Trieste, Italy

Abstract

Hematocrit (HCT) is a crucial parameter for both adult and pediatric patients, indicating potentially severe pathological conditions. Most common methods for HCT assessment are microhematocrit and automated analyzers; however, developing countries present specific needs often not addressed by these technologies. Paper-based devices can be suitable for those environments being inexpensive, rapid, easy to use, and portable. The aim of this study is to describe and validate against a reference method, a novel HCT estimation method based on penetration velocity in lateral flow test strips complying with the requirements in low- or middle-income country (LMIC) scenarios. To calibrate and test the proposed method, 145 blood samples of 105 healthy neonates with gestational age greater than 37 weeks were collected (29 calibration set, 116 test set) in the range of HCT values (31.6–72.5%). The time difference (Δt) from the whole blood sample loading into the test strip instant till the nitrocellulose membrane saturation instant was measured by a reflectance meter. A nonlinear relation was observed between HCT and Δt and was estimated by a third-degree polynomial equation (R2 = 0.91) valid in 30% to 70% HCT interval. The proposed model was subsequently used to estimate HCT values on the test set showing a good agreement between the estimated HCT and the HCT measured by the reference method (r = 0.87, p < 0.001), with a low mean difference of 0.53 ± 5.04% and a slight trend of overestimation for higher hematocrit values. The mean absolute error was 4.29%, while the maximum absolute error was 10.69%. Although the proposed method did not present a sufficient accuracy to be used for diagnostic purposes, it could be suitable as a fast, low-cost, easy-to-use screening tool especially in LMIC scenarios.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Electrical and Electronic Engineering,Biochemistry,Instrumentation,Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics,Analytical Chemistry

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3