Pharmacological Treatment of Bipolar Depression: A Review of Observational Studies

Author:

Fellendorf Frederike T.1ORCID,Caboni Edoardo2ORCID,Paribello Pasquale34ORCID,Pinna Martina5,D’Aloja Ernesto6ORCID,Carucci Sara78ORCID,Pinna Federica34,Reininghaus Eva Z.1ORCID,Carpiniello Bernardo34,Manchia Mirko349ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapeutic Medicine, Medical University Graz, A-8036 Graz, Austria

2. Psychiatrische Universitätsklinik Zürich Zaft, University of Zürich, CH-8006 Zürich, Switzerland

3. Unit of Clinical Psychiatry, University Hospital Agency of Cagliari, 09124 Cagliari, Italy

4. Unit of Psychiatry, Department of Medical Science and Public Health, University of Cagliari, 09124 Cagliari, Italy

5. Forensic Psychiatry Unit, Health Agency of Cagliari, 09124 Cagliari, Italy

6. Section of Legal Medicine, Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari, 09124 Cagliari, Italy

7. Department of Biomedical Sciences, Section of Neuroscience and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Cagliari, 09124 Cagliari, Italy

8. Child and Adolescent Neuropsychiatry Unit, Department of Biomedical Sciences, “A. Cao” Paediatric Hospital, 09121 Cagliari, Italy

9. Department of Pharmacology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada

Abstract

The persistence of depressive morbidity is frequent in bipolar disorder, and the pharmacological management of this symptomatology often lacks effectiveness. This systematic review aimed to summarize the results of the naturalistic observational studies on the pharmacological treatment of bipolar depression published through April 2022. The certainty of evidence was evaluated according to the GRADE approach. In sum, 16 studies on anticonvulsants, 20 on atypical antipsychotics, 2 on lithium, 28 on antidepressants, and 9 on other compounds were found. Lamotrigine, quetiapine, aripiprazole, and ketamine were the most investigated compounds. Overall, the results support the recommendations regarding the effectiveness of lamotrigine and quetiapine. In contrast to the current recommendations, aripiprazole was shown to be effective and generally well tolerated. Additionally, SSRIs were shown to be effective, but, since they were associated with a possibly higher switch risk, they should be used as an adjunctive therapy to mood stabilizers. Lithium was only studied in two trials but was shown to be effective, although the serum concentrations levels were not associated with clinical response. Finally, ketamine showed divergent response rates with a low certainty of evidence and, so far, unclear long-term effects. Heterogeneity in diagnosis, sample sizes, study designs, reporting of bias, and side effects limited the possibility of a head-to-head comparison.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Drug Discovery,Pharmaceutical Science,Molecular Medicine

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3