Embryo Transfer Procedural Parameters Do Not Predict IVF Cycle Outcome

Author:

Sfakianoudis Konstantinos1,Maziotis Evangelos2ORCID,Trypidi Anna2,Grigoriadis Sokratis2ORCID,Vaxevanoglou Terpsithea1,Angeli Irene1,Rapani Anna2ORCID,Kotsifaki Amalia2,Pistola Kalliopi2ORCID,Pantou Agni1ORCID,Dafopoulos Konstantinos3ORCID,Pantos Konstantinos1,Simopoulou Mara2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Genesis Athens Clinic, Centre for Human Reproduction, Papanikoli, 15232 Athens, Greece

2. Department of Physiology, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece

3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, 41500 Larisa, Greece

Abstract

Background: this study aims to assess the effect of embryo transfer (ET) performance parameters of a technical nature on IVF outcome. Methods: A total of 1417 ETs from a single IVF center were included in this prospective observational study. The parameters investigated were as follows: the presence of cervical mucus post catheter withdrawal, the presence of blood, catheter reload, the employment of a tenaculum and stylet, catheter resistance as experienced by the physician and patient discomfort. Results: When ET performance parameters were associated with clinical outcomes on a singular level, none of the ET parameters presented with any statistical significance. The evaluation of covariates indicated that the number and the quality of transferred embryos, as well as maternal age, exerted a statistically significant effect on clinical outcomes. In a multivariate analysis, only the presence of mucus along with significant catheter resistance presented with statistical significance; however, when adjusting for covariates, this combination showed no statistically significant effect on clinical outcomes. Conclusions: the results indicate that the time-consuming process of recording and analyzing ET performance parameters fails to offer any additional value in predicting the cycle’s outcome, while factors like embryo quality and number, as well as maternal age, seem to be the sole robust predictive factors of an IVF cycle.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference48 articles.

1. Assessment and Treatment of Repeated Implantation Failure (RIF);Simon;J. Assist. Reprod. Genet.,2012

2. Importance of Embryo Transfer Technique in Maximizing Assisted Reproductive Outcomes;Schoolcraft;Fertil. Steril.,2016

3. The Role of Timing in Frozen Embryo Transfer;Lensen;Fertil. Steril.,2022

4. Cleavage-stage versus Blastocyst-stage Embryo Transfer in Assisted Reproductive Technology;Glujovsky;Cochrane Database Syst. Rev.,2022

5. Blastocyst vs Cleavage-Stage Embryo Transfer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Reproductive Outcomes;Martins;Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol.,2017

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3