Author:
Munaro Nicola,Poletto Cecilia
Abstract
In this work we examine the distribution of wh-in-situ and short (i.e., clause internal) wh-doubling in Northern Italian dialects with the purpose of showing that wh-in-situ and wh-doubling are not unitary phenomena, since they are subject to different distributional properties across dialects. We show that wh-doubling cannot be reduced to a single analysis but rather corresponds to a family of phenomena which have in common the basic procedure of feature doubling, within which the copying mechanism applies to different subsets or packages of features and is constrained in different ways. Furthermore, some types of doubling correspond in their distribution with some types of wh-in-situ, which shows that the two phenomena must be related and that different types of wh-in-situ are the null counterpart of different types of wh-doubling. However, in the languages in which wh-in-situ is generalized, wh-in-situ has nothing to do with wh-doubling.
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics
Reference43 articles.
1. Barbiers, Sjef (2008). Microvariation in Syntactic Doubling, Brill.
2. Barbiers, Sjef, Delbar, Natasja, Fanselow, Gisbert, Nauta, Sophia, and Rothert, Johannes (2022). On the Asymmetry of wh-Doubling in Varieties of German and Dutch, Leiden University. Manuscript.
3. Baunaz, Lena (2011). The Grammar of French Quantification, Springer.
4. Brandt, Patrick, and Fuss, Eric (2006). Form, Structure and Grammar, Akademie Verlag. Studia Grammatica 63.
5. A case of do-support in Romance;Poletto;Natural Language and Linguistic Theory,2004
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献