Affiliation:
1. Department of English, Illinois State University, Normal, IL 61790-4240, USA
2. Department of English, Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, GA 30144-5659, USA
Abstract
Ecological models of competition have provided great explanatory power regarding synonymy in derivational morphology. Competition models of this type have certainly shown their utility, as they have demonstrated, among other things, the relevance of frequency measures, productivity, compositionality and analyzability when comparing the development of morphological constructions. There has been less consideration of alternative models that could be used to describe the historical co-development of suffixes that produce words with sometimes similar forms or meanings but are not inevitably or solely in competition. The symbiotic model proposed in this article may help answer larger questions in linguistics, such as how best to analyze certain multilingual morphological phenomena, including the emergence of semantically similar forms within the same language. The present study demonstrates the importance of a diachronic approach in situations of near-synonymy, as an understanding of semantic similarity necessitates a review of the available historical record. In particular, our study focuses on the case of the suffix -eer (e.g., marketeer) in English, analyzing its origins, semantics, compositionality, and historical development, including its symbiotic relationship to the similar suffix -er (e.g., marketer).
Reference68 articles.
1. Analogy in suffix rivalry: The case of English -ity and -ness;English Language and Linguistics,2014
2. Elia, Annibale, Iacobini, Claudio, and Voghera, Miriam (2016). Livelli di Analisi e Fenomeni di Interfaccia. Atti del XLVII Congresso Internazionale della Società di Linguistica Italiana, Bulzoni Editore.
3. Rainer, Franz, Gardani, Francesco, Dressler, Wolfgang U., and Luschützky, Hans Christian (2019). Competition in Inflection and Word-Formation, Springer.
4. Three ways of looking at morphological rivalry;Aronoff;Word Structure,2023
5. Cognitive corpus linguistics: Five points of debate on current theory and methodology;Arppe;Corpora,2010
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献