Kinetic Comparison between Drop Jumps and Horizontal Drop Jumps in Elite Jumpers and Sprinters

Author:

Montoro-Bombú Raynier123ORCID,Miranda-Oliveira Paulo345ORCID,Valamatos Maria João67ORCID,João Filipa67ORCID,Buurke Tom J. W.89ORCID,Cupido Santos Amândio1ORCID,Rama Luís1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Research Unit for Sport and Physical Activity (CIDAF), Faculty of Sport Sciences and Physical Education, University of Coimbra, 3040-256 Coimbra, Portugal

2. ISCE—Polytechnic University of Lisbon and Tagus Valey, Department of Sport Sciences, 2620-379 Lisbon, Portugal

3. Portuguese Athletics Federation (FPA), 2799-538 Lisboa, Portugal

4. Interdisciplinary Research Centre Egas Moniz (CIIEM), Egas Moniz School of Health & Science, 2829-511 Almada, Portugal

5. School of Technology and Management (ESTG), Polytechnic of Leiria, 2411-901 Leiria, Portugal

6. Laboratório de Biomecânica e Morfologia Funcional, Faculdade de Motricidade Humana, Universidade de Lisboa, 1499-002 Lisboa, Portugal

7. Centro Interdisciplinar para o Estudo da Performance Humana (CIPER), Faculdade de Motricidade Humana, 1499-002 Lisboa, Portugal

8. University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Human Movement Sciences, 9750 Groningen, The Netherlands

9. KU Leuven, Department of Movement Sciences, 3001 Leuven, Belgium

Abstract

Previous research addressed the spatiotemporal variables of the drop jump (DJ) versus the horizontal drop jump (HDJ). This study compared the kinetic variables of the DJ versus the HDJ in elite jumpers and sprinters. In a single session, sixteen elite jumpers and sprinters performed two DJ attempts with three different fall heights (0.30 m, 0.40 m, and 0.50 m), and after 2 h, performed two HDJ attempts from the same fall heights (0.30 m, 0.40 m, and 0.50 m). Kinetic variables: eccentric ground reaction forces (GRFE) and concentric ground reaction forces; eccentric impulse (PE) and concentric impulse (PC); peak power in the concentric phase; and rate of force decrease (RFDe) were measured using a research-grade force plate. The Wilcoxon test was used to compare the vertical and anteroposterior axes. GRFE was significantly higher (p ≤ 0.05) in the DJ vs the HDJ with large effect sizes. The PE (p ≤ 0.006) and PC (p = 0.002) were significantly lower in the DJ than in the HDJ. The RFDe was also significantly lower in the DJ at 0.30 m vs. the HDJ at 0.30 m (p = 0.002). In summary, elite jumpers and sprinters may benefit from incorporating both the DJ and the HDJ into their training regimens, with the DJ being particularly advantageous for enhancing power metrics and RFDe.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference48 articles.

1. A Methodological Approach to Quantifying Plyometric Intensity;Jarvis;J. Strength Cond. Res.,2016

2. Quantifying plyometric intensity via rate of force development, knee joint, and ground reaction forces;Jensen;J. Strength Cond. Res.,2007

3. Quantification of vertical ground reaction forces of popular bilateral plyometric exercises;Wallace;J. Strength Cond. Res.,2010

4. Optimum Drop Jump Height in Division III Athletes: Under 75% of Vertical Jump Height;Peng;Int. J. Sports Med.,2017

5. The effect of drop jump starting height and contact time on power, work performed, and moment of force;Walsh;J. Strength Cond. Res.,2004

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3