Morton’s Extension on Hallux Rigidus Pathology

Author:

Sánchez-Gómez Rubén12ORCID,López-Alcorocho Juan Manuel3ORCID,Núñez-Fernández Almudena1ORCID,González Fernández María Luz1,Martínez-Sebastián Carlos4,Ortuño-Soriano Ismael1ORCID,Zaragoza-García Ignacio15ORCID,Gómez-Carrión Álvaro1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Podiatry, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain

2. Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), 28040 Madrid, Spain

3. Research Unit of Clínica CEMTRO, 28035 Madrid, Spain

4. Department Nursing and Podiatry, University of Malaga, 29016 Málaga, Spain

5. Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria imas12, Grupo Invecuid, 28041 Madrid, Spain

Abstract

Study design, case-control study: Background, Morton’s extension (ME) is a kind of orthotic that has been used as a conservative treatment of painful hallux rigidus (HR) osteoarthritis, but only their effects on first metatarsophalangeal joint (MPJ) mobility and position in healthy subjects have been studied, but not on its applied pulled tension forces neither in subjects with HR. Objectives: This study sought to understand how ME’s orthotics with three different thicknesses could influence the kinematic first MPJ by measuring hallux dorsiflexion using Jack’s test and a digital algometer with a rigid strip anchored to the iron hook’s extremity and comparing subjects with healthy first MPJ mobility to those with HR. We aimed to clarify whether tension values were different between healthy and HR subjects. Methods: Fifty-eight subjects were selected, of whom thirty were included in the case group according to HR criteria and twenty-eight were included in the control group. A digital algometer (FPX®® 25, Wagner Instruments®®, Greenwich, CT, USA) was used to assess the pulled tension values (kgf) of the first MPJ during Jack’s test. Results: The pulled tension values were highly reliable (ICC > 0.963). There were no statistically significant differences between the pulled tension values for the different ME conditions in the case (p = 0.969) or control (p = 0.718) groups. However, as it’s expected, there were statistically significant differences comparing all pulled tension values between case and control group subjects (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Different ME’s thicknesses had no influence on the pulled effort applied during the dorsiflexion Jack’s test between the healthy and HR groups; therefore, it can be prescribed without joint-care danger. In addition, it is proven that there is greater resistance to performing Jack’s test in the HR group than in the healthy group, regardless of ME’s orthotics. Furthermore, it is shown that the digital algometer device is a valid tool to detect the first MPJ restriction and is more reliable than other tests.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science

Reference63 articles.

1. Forces under the hallux rigidus foot with surgical and orthotic intervention;Stuck;J. Am. Podiatr. Med. Assoc.,1988

2. Stiffness of the Great Toe in Adolescents;Cotterill;Br. Med. J.,1887

3. Hallux equinus. The stages of hallux limitus and hallux rigidus;Rzonca;J. Am. Podiatr. Med. Assoc.,1984

4. The efficacy of shoe modifications and foot orthoses in treating patients with hallux rigidus: A comprehensive review of literature;Fusini;Acta Biomed.,2020

5. A comprehensive and narrative review of historical aspects and management of low-grade hallux rigidus: Conservative and surgical possibilities;Caravelli;Musculoskelet. Surg.,2018

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3