Children’s Participation in Care and Protection Decision-Making Matters

Author:

Cashmore Judith1ORCID,Kong Peiling2ORCID,McLaine Meredith23

Affiliation:

1. School of Education and Social Work, University of Sydney, Sydney 2006, Australia

2. Sydney Law School, University of Sydney, Sydney 2006, Australia

3. School of Law, University of Wollongong, Wollongong 2522, Australia

Abstract

Laws and policies in different jurisdictions provide a range of mechanisms that allow children involved in child protection processes and care proceedings to express their views when decisions that affect them are being made. Whether these mechanisms facilitate children’s involvement and whether they result in children’s views being heard and “given due weight in accordance with the age and maturity of the child”, as required by article 12 of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, is the focus of this article. The law, policy and practice in New South Wales, Australia, are used to provide a contextual illustration of the wider theoretical and practical issues, drawing on international comparisons and research. It is clear there is still some way to go to satisfy the requirements of article 12 in Australia and other jurisdictions. These mechanisms often do not provide the information children need to understand the process, nor do they consistently encourage meaningful participation through trusted advocates who can accurately convey children’s views to those making the decisions. It is generally unclear how children’s views are heard, interpreted, and weighted in decision-making processes. The research findings from a number of countries, however, are clear and consistent that children often feel ‘unheard’ and that they have had few opportunities to say what is important to them. A number of conclusions and practice suggestions are outlined for how the law could better accommodate children’s views.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Law

Reference140 articles.

1. Advocate for Children and Young People (NSW) (2023, March 20). The Voices of Children and Young People in Out-of-Home Care 2021, Available online: https://apo.org.au/node/318895.

2. Ananth, Akhila Lalitha (2014). Spatializing Child Welfare: Edelman Children’s Court and the Geography of Juvenile Dependency. [Ph.D. thesis, University of California]. Available online: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0n99q2s6.

3. Arabena, Kerry, Bunston, Wendy, Campbell, D., Eccles, K., Hume, D., and King, S. (2023, March 20). Evaluation of Marram-Ngala Ganbu: A Koori Family Hearing Day at the Children’s Court of Victoria in Broadmeadows, Available online: https://www.childrenscourt.vic.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-11/Evaluation%20of%20Marram-Ngala%20Ganbu.pdf.

4. Balancing a child’s best interests and a child’s views;Archard;The International Journal of Children’s Rights,2009

5. Australian Broadcasting Commission (2023, May 24). Magistrate Praised for Kids Letter on Custody Call. Available online: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-06-07/magistrate-praised-for-letter-to-kids-on-custody-call/4057526.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3