The Impact of Individual Capabilities on Ecosystem Services and Farmers’ Well-Being: A Case Study of the Loess Plateau, China
-
Published:2024-04-29
Issue:9
Volume:16
Page:3715
-
ISSN:2071-1050
-
Container-title:Sustainability
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Sustainability
Author:
Liu Di1, Wang Qifei1, Lu Yayan1ORCID, Shi Qinqin2, Zhang Jie3
Affiliation:
1. School of Tourism, Henan Normal University, Xinxiang 453007, China 2. Institute of Resource-Based Economic Transition Development, Shanxi University of Finance and Economics, Taiyuan 030006, China 3. College of Urban and Environmental Studies, Northwest University, Xi’an 710127, China
Abstract
Exploring the impact of individual capabilities on ecosystem services and farmers’ well-being is conducive to discovering the complex relationship between ESs and human well-being, and has clear practical value for the sustainable management and improvement of farmers’ well-being in ecologically fragile areas in China. An importance–accessibility index of ESs was constructed and the objective well-being and subjective well-being of farmers were assessed. Subsequently, the relationship among capabilities, ESs, and well-being was elucidated based on a structural equation model. The results showed that fruits, pest control, fuelwood, water conservation, and wild food were the ES types that contributed most to farmers’ well-being. There were some similarities and differences between the dimensions of objective and subjective well-being. For example, farmers with adequate leisure time reported higher leisure satisfaction and farmers with relatively adequate income levels reported the lowest income satisfaction. The direct effect of capabilities on ESs and objective well-being was significant, and the direct effect of capabilities on their subjective well-being was not significant. Their capabilities had a significant indirect impact on their objective well-being by influencing ESs and did not have a significant indirect impact on their subjective well-being by influencing ESs; their capabilities had a significant indirect impact on their subjective well-being by influencing the ESs and objective well-being. Physical health, mental health, and agricultural skills were the key types of capabilities that influenced the farmers’ access to ESs and well-being. Improving these capabilities can enable local farmers to more fully access ESs and improve their well-being.
Funder
National Natural Science Foundation of China Opening Foundation of Yunnan Key Laboratory of Plateau Wetland Conservation, Restoration and Ecological Services Natural Science Foundation of Henan Province Doctoral Research Project of Henan Normal University
Reference67 articles.
1. Twenty years of ecosystem services: How far have we come and how far do we still need to go?;Costanza;Ecosyst. Serv.,2017 2. Social innovation in a typical social-ecological system in China: Identifying linkages between the dependence of key stakeholders on ecosystem services and the level of their multi-dimensional human well-being;Xu;Environ. Policy Gov.,2022 3. Liu, M., Wei, H., Dong, X., Wang, X.-C., Zhao, B., and Zhang, Y. (2022). Integrating land use, ecosystem service, and human well-being: A systematic review. Sustainability, 14. 4. Huang, Q.X., Yin, D., He, C.Y., Yan, J.B., Liu, Z.W., Meng, S.T., Ren, Q., Zhao, R., and Inostroza, L. (2020). Linking ecosystem services and subjective well-being in rapidly urbanizing watersheds: Insights from a multilevel linear model. Ecosyst. Serv., 43. 5. Li, S., Yu, D., and Li, X. (2023). Exploring the impacts of ecosystem services on human well-being in Qinghai Province under the framework of the sustainable development goals. J. Environ. Manag., 345.
|
|