Color Differences of Polimerized Resin-Based Composites and Corresponding Shade Guides

Author:

Fernández Millán David1,Pose Rodríguez Jose Manuel2,López Castro Gonzalo2,Alonso de la Peña Victor2,Gallas Torreira Mercedes2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Researcher Digital Dentistry and New Technologies Unit, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain

2. School of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study is to analyze and compare the colors (A2, A3 and A3.5) of polymerized resin-based composites (RBCs) with respect to the shade numbers within each product line and the VITAPAN Classical® shade guide they purported to represent. Methods: Three A-shades (A2, A3 and A3.5) from four RBC products (Harmonize®, Empress® Direct®, Grandio® and Filtek® 500) were compared within the VITAPAN Classical® shade guide and within their own commercial shade guide. Nine disk-shaped specimens, 6 mm in diameter and 2 mm thick, were prepared for each RBC color (three of each color). The color measurements were made according to the CIE L*a*b* color scale (quantifying L*c*h*a*b* values) using a Vita Easyshade Compact IV® digital spectrophotometer. We calculated the CIEDE2000 color differences between polymerized composites and shade guides, as well as between composites. The values obtained from composites and samples of the color guides in the CIE L*a*b* space were represented by ICC3D software (Version 1.2.9) Results: The ANOVA test verified the existence of statistically significant differences between composites for the same shades (p < 0.05) except for shade A2. CIEDE2000 color differences between composites and the VITAPAN Classical® shade guide ranged from 3.5 to 13.1 depending on the composite and the shade. Conclusions: There were color differences among the polymerized resin-based composites, between these and their own shade guides/manufacturer’s commercial guides, and between the former and the corresponding samples of the VITAPAN Classical® shade guide. Clinical significance: Color selection when performing an aesthetic dental restoration is essential for the clinician and the patient to obtain an optimal result. Taking into account the color difference (∆E00) for each composite with the VITAPAN Classical® shade guide or with the manufacturers’ commercial guide allows for more precision with shade selection in aesthetic dentistry.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference53 articles.

1. Dental color matching: A comparison between visual and instrumental methods;Igiel;Dent. Mater. J.,2016

2. Color Changes of Dental Resin Composites before and after Polymerization and Storage in Water;Yilmaz;J. Esthet. Restor. Dent.,2011

3. Evaluation of visual and instrument shade matching;Okubo;J. Prosthet. Dent.,1998

4. Comission International de l’Eclaraige (2004). CIE Technical Report: Colorimetry, CIE Central Bureau. [3rd ed.]. CIE Pub. No 15.

5. A Comparision of new and conventional methods for quantificationof tooth color;Borsboom;J. Prosthet. Dent.,1990

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3