Communications and High-Precision Positioning (CHP2): Hardware Architecture, Implementation, and Validation
Author:
Yu Hanguang1, Herschfelt Andrew1, Wu Shunyao1ORCID, Srinivas Sharanya1ORCID, Li Yang1, Sciammetta Nunzio1, Smith Leslie1, Rueger Klaus1, Lee Hyunseok1, Chakrabarti Chaitali1, Bliss Daniel W.1
Affiliation:
1. Center for Wireless Information Systems and Computational Architectures (WISCA), Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281, USA
Abstract
Spectral congestion and modern consumer applications motivate radio technologies that efficiently cooperate with nearby users and provide several services simultaneously. We designed and implemented a joint positioning-communications system that simultaneously enables network communications, timing synchronization, and localization to a variety of airborne and ground-based platforms. This Communications and High-Precision Positioning (CHP2) system simultaneously performs communications and precise ranging (<10 cm) with a narrow band waveform (10 MHz) at a carrier frequency of 915 MHz (US ISM) or 783 MHz (EU Licensed). The ranging capability may be extended to estimate the relative position and orientation by leveraging the spatial diversity of the multiple-input, multiple-output (MIMO) platforms. CHP2 also digitally synchronizes distributed platforms with sub-nanosecond precision without support from external systems (GNSS, GPS, etc.). This performance is enabled by leveraging precise time-of-arrival (ToA) estimation techniques, a network synchronization algorithm, and the intrinsic cooperation in the joint processing chain that executes these tasks simultaneously. In this manuscript, we describe the CHP2 system architecture, hardware implementation, and in-lab and over-the-air experimental validation.
Subject
Electrical and Electronic Engineering,Biochemistry,Instrumentation,Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics,Analytical Chemistry
Reference89 articles.
1. Wireless communications with unmanned aerial vehicles: Opportunities and challenges;Zeng;IEEE Commun. Mag.,2016 2. Valavanis, K.P., and Vachtsevanos, G.J. (2015). Handbook of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles, Springer. 3. Schoettle, B., and Sivak, M. (2014). A Survey of Public Opinion about Autonomous and Self-Driving Vehicles in the US, the UK, and Australia, University of Michigan, Transportation Research Institute. Technical Report. 4. Thipphavong, D.P., Apaza, R., Barmore, B., Battiste, V., Burian, B., Dao, Q., Feary, M., Go, S., Goodrich, K.H., and Homola, J. (2018, January 25–29). Urban air mobility airspace integration concepts and considerations. Proceedings of the 2018 Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference, Atlanta, GE, USA. 5. An overview of current research and developments in urban air mobility–Setting the scene for UAM introduction;Straubinger;J. Air Transp. Manag.,2020
|
|