Reporting Corporate Risk: An Empirical Inquiry into Listed Entities in the Saudi Capital Market

Author:

Al-Sahali Samihah1ORCID,Al-Adeem Khalid2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Accounting Department, University of Hafr Al-Batin, Hafr Al Batin 39524, Saudi Arabia

2. Accounting Department, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia

Abstract

A capital market with greater transparency provides more accurate metrics for measuring corporate performance, which can be utilized to inform market participants’ decisions. Informed risk is crucial to corporate reporting transparency. This empirical study explores the extent to which firms in the Saudi capital market disclose risk information, whether financial or non-financial. A risk disclosure index (RDI) is constructed based on a rigorous literature review of previous studies, considering suggested items related to corporate risk that must be disclosed. The sample comprises 50 corporations, with five companies representing the energy sector, three representing the utility sector, and forty-two representing the materials sector. The findings reveal moderate financial risk disclosure (sample mean 56%) and low non-financial risk disclosure (sample mean 33%) in the Saudi capital market. In the energy sector, the disclosed financial and non-financial risks comprise 57% and 37%, respectively; in the utility sector, these proportions are 56% and 31%, while in the materials sector, they are 54% and 33%, respectively. Regulators should prioritize high-quality, transparent, and comparable risk information disclosure to attract direct foreign investment. To improve their risk disclosure, managers of firms can also employ the RDI to examine the extent of risk their companies face. This study is limited to the annual and board reports of companies in the three sectors.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference108 articles.

1. The social significance of the modern corporation;Kaysen;Am. Econ. Rev.,1957

2. Big businesses and economic growth: Identifying a binding constraint for growth with country panel analysis;Lee;J. Comp. Econ.,2013

3. Giant companies in the United Kingdom 1948-69;Meeks;Econ. J.,1975

4. A need for theorizing corporation: An accounting perspective;Int. J. Acc. Res.,2017

5. Financial reporting in the twentieth century: Where have we been, and where are we going?;Munter;J. Corp. Acc. Financ.,1999

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3