What Types of Animals Should Be in the Future Zoo? Thoughts from United States Residents and Zoo and Aquarium Staff

Author:

Powell David M.1ORCID,Meyer Theodore G.2,Dorsey Candice3,Vernon Rob4

Affiliation:

1. Department of Reproductive and Behavioral Sciences, Saint Louis Zoo, Saint Louis, MO 63110, USA

2. Volunteer, Saint Louis Zoo, Saint Louis, MO 63110, USA

3. Department of Conservation, Management, and Welfare Sciences, Association of Zoos and Aquariums, Silver Spring, MD 20910, USA

4. Department of External Affairs, Association of Zoos and Aquariums, Silver Spring, MD 20910, USA

Abstract

Humans are biased in their preferences for animals, and this may impact the composition of zoological collections. We assessed which kinds of animals the public and zoo professionals want to preserve in zoos for the future and analyzed these lists for previously identified biases and agreement across surveyed groups. We also characterized agreement among the surveyed groups on the roles of zoos and the composition of animal collections. We surveyed people who live in the United States, members of the Association of Zoos and Aquariums (AZA), and AZA zoo and aquarium directors. There was agreement among surveyed groups on the roles of zoos, though some differences existed. Zoo professionals and the public generally agreed on the emphasis on various categories of animals for zoo collections, though some differences were noted. We found evidence of bias towards mammals, charismatic megafauna, and felids across all surveyed groups. Agreement was high between AZA members and directors and moderate between zoo professionals and the public. These results indicate that these groups are generally in agreement about the roles of zoos, how they should compose their animal collections, and what animal species, in particular, should be kept in zoos for the future, allowing zoos to compose their collections to maximize delivery on their mission goals as well as address the preferences of the public.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference62 articles.

1. Morris, D., and Morris, R. (1966). Men and Pandas, McGraw-Hill.

2. Social construction, political power, and the allocation of benefits to endangered species;Czech;Conserv. Biol.,1998

3. Values and perceptions of invertebrates;Kellert;Conserv. Biol.,1993

4. Kellert, S.R. (1996). The Value of Life: Biological Diversity and Human Society, Island Press. Available online: https://books.google.com/books?id=Caq8BwAAQBAJ.

5. Ideal animals and animal traits for zoos: General public perspectives;Carr;Tour. Manag.,2016

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3