Affiliation:
1. Insper Institute of Education and Research, Rua Quatá 300, São Paulo 04546-042, Brazil
Abstract
This paper expands traditional stochastic volatility models by allowing for time-varying skewness without imposing it. While dynamic asymmetry may capture the likely direction of future asset returns, it comes at the risk of leading to overparameterization. Our proposed approach mitigates this concern by leveraging sparsity-inducing priors to automatically select the skewness parameter as dynamic, static or zero in a data-driven framework. We consider two empirical applications. First, in a bond yield application, dynamic skewness captures interest rate cycles of monetary easing and tightening and is partially explained by central banks’ mandates. In a currency modeling framework, our model indicates no skewness in the carry factor after accounting for stochastic volatility. This supports the idea of carry crashes resulting from volatility surges instead of dynamic skewness.
Reference46 articles.
1. Portfolio selection;Markowitz;J. Financ.,1952
2. The role of conditioning information in deducing testable restrictions implied by dynamic asset pricing models;Hansen;Econom. J. Econom. Soc.,1987
3. Bayesian analysis of stochastic volatility models;Jacquier;J. Bus. Econ. Stat.,2002
4. Shephard, N. (2005). Stochastic Volatility: Selected Readings, OUP.
5. Bianchi, D., De Polis, A., and Petrella, I. (2023, January 14). Taming Momentum Crashes. Available online: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4182040.