Abstract
Decades of studies trying to define the extent to which artificial neural networks can exhibit systematicity suggest that systematicity can be achieved by connectionist models but not by default. Here we present a novel connectionist model of sentence production that employs rich situation model representations originally proposed for modeling systematicity in comprehension. The high performance of our model demonstrates that such representations are also well suited to model language production. Furthermore, the model can produce multiple novel sentences for previously unseen situations, including in a different voice (actives vs. passive) and with words in new syntactic roles, thus demonstrating semantic and syntactic generalization and arguably systematicity. Our results provide yet further evidence that such connectionist approaches can achieve systematicity, in production as well as comprehension. We propose our positive results to be a consequence of the regularities of the microworld from which the semantic representations are derived, which provides a sufficient structure from which the neural network can interpret novel inputs.
Funder
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
National Science Foundation
Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología
Reference59 articles.
1. Syntactic Structures;Chomsky,1957
2. Connectionism and cognitive architecture: A critical analysis
3. Connectionism and the problem of systematicity: Why Smolensky's solution doesn't work
4. The language of thought;Fodor,1975
5. Vision: A Computational Investigation into the Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information;Marr,1982
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献