Hiatal Hernias Revisited—A Systematic Review of Definitions, Classifications, and Applications

Author:

Fuchs Karl Hermann1,Kafetzis Ioannis1,Hann Alexander12,Meining Alexander12

Affiliation:

1. Laboratory for Interventional and Experimental Endoscopy (InExEn), University of Würzburg, Grombühlstr. 12, 97080 Würzburg, Germany

2. Head of Gastroenterology, Zentrum Innere Medizin, University of Würzburg, 97080 Würzburg, Germany

Abstract

Introduction: A hiatal hernia (HH) can be defined as a condition in which elements from the abdominal cavity herniate through the oesophageal hiatus in the mediastinum and, in the majority of cases, parts of the proximal stomach. Today, the role of HHs within the complex entity of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is very important with regard to its pathophysiology, severity, and therapeutic and prognostic options. Despite this, the application and stringent use of the worldwide accepted classification (Skinner and Belsey: Types I–IV) are lacking. The aim of this study was to carry out a systematic review of the clinical applications of HH classifications and scientific documentation over time, considering their value in diagnosis and treatment. Methods: Following the PRISMA concept, all abstracts published on pubmed.gov until 12/2023 (hiatal hernia) were reviewed, and those with a focus and clear description of the application of the current HH classification in the full-text version were analysed to determine the level of classification and its use within the therapeutic context. Results: In total, 9342 abstracts were screened. In 9199 of the abstracts, the reports had a different focus than HH, or the HH classification was not used or was incompletely applied. After further investigation, 60 papers were used for a detailed analysis, which included more than 12,000 patient datapoints. Among the 8904 patients, 83% had a Type I HH; 4% had Type II; 11% had Type III; and 1% had Type IV. Further subgroup analyses were performed. Overall, the precise application of the HH classification has been insufficient, considering that only 1% of all papers and only 54% of those with a special focus on HH have documented its use. Conclusions: The application and documentation of a precise HH classification in clinical practice and scientific reports are decreasing, which should be rectified for the purpose of scientific comparability.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference101 articles.

1. Hernia diaphragmatica hiatus oesophagei vom anatomischen und rontgenologischen gesichtspunkt;Akerlund;Acta Radiol.,1926

2. The frequency and diagnosis of hiatal hernia;Guthrie;Ann. Surg.,1940

3. The Surgical Treatment of the More Common Type of Diaphragmatic Hernia: Report of 404 Cases;Harrington;Ann. Surg.,1945

4. Oesophageal hiatus hernia;Stapleton;Can. Med. Assoc. J.,1947

5. Diagnosis and treatment of para-oesophageal hiatus hernia;Trueman;Can. Med. Assoc. J.,1947

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3