Enhancing the Performance of a Simulated WWTP: Comparative Analysis of Control Strategies for the BSM2 Model

Author:

Roșu Bogdan1,Mocanu George Dănuț2ORCID,Pila Mihaela Munteanu3,Murariu Gabriel4ORCID,Roșu Adrian4,Arseni Maxim5ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Automation, Computer Sciences, Electronics and Electrical Engineering, “Dunărea de Jos” University of Galaţi, Domnească 47, 800008 Galaţi, Romania

2. Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, “Dunărea de Jos” University of Galați, Domneascǎ 47, 800008 Galați, Romania

3. Faculty of Engineering and Agriculture, “Dunărea de Jos” University of Galați, Domnească 47, 800008 Galați, Romania

4. Faculty of Sciences and Environment, REXDAN Research Infrastructure, “Dunărea de Jos” University of Galaţi, Domnească 47, 800008 Galaţi, Romania

5. Spinoff Geomax S.R.L., Albatrosului 2, 800029 Galați, Romania

Abstract

This study aimed to improve the performance of a wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) simulated with Benchmark Model No. 2 (BSM2). To achieve this objective, three control strategies were implemented and tested. The first control strategy aimed to maintain the concentration of nitrate and nitrite nitrogen (SNO) by controlling the external carbon flowrate (strategy A1), and the second control strategy aimed to maintain the ammonia and ammonium nitrogen (SNH) at a desired level with the use of a cascade controller (strategy A2). The third strategy was applied to control the total suspended solids (TSS) (strategy A3). Combinations of these strategies were considered (B1, B2, and B3 strategies), as well as the use of all three together (strategy C1). The control strategies presented in this paper were compared to the default control strategy of BSM2 to validate and identify the one that provided the best performance. The results revealed that the B1 strategy was the most environmentally friendly, while C1 obtained the highest overall performance. Several Monte Carlo simulations were performed for the validated control strategies, to identify the optimal setpoint values. For the C1 strategy, a second method of optimization regarding polynomial interpolation was considered. The applied optimization methods provided the optimal reference values for the PI (proportional integral) controllers.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Mathematics,Engineering (miscellaneous),Computer Science (miscellaneous)

Reference36 articles.

1. Wastewater Management through the Ages: A History of Mankind;Lofrano;Sci. Total Environ.,2010

2. Effects of Eutrophication;Dorgham;Eutrophication Causes Conseq. Control.,2014

3. Kennish, M.J. (2023). Reference Module in Earth Systems and Environmental Sciences, Elsevier.

4. Wilkinson, G.M. (2017). Encyclopedia of Sustainable Technologies, Elsevier.

5. Crini, G., and Lichtfouse, E. (2018). Green Adsorbents for Pollutant Removal, Springer.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3