Spatial Planning of Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) in the Southern Caspian Sea: Comparison of Multi-Criteria Evaluation (MCE) and Simulated Annealing Algorithm

Author:

Ashtab Dariush1ORCID,Gholamalifard Mehdi1ORCID,Jokar Parviz1,Kostianoy Andrey G.23ORCID,Semenov Aleksander V.3

Affiliation:

1. Department of Environment, Faculty of Natural Resources and Marine Sciences (FNRMS), Tarbiat Modares University, P.O. Box 46414-356, Noor 46417-76489, Mazandaran, Iran

2. Shirshov Institute of Oceanology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Nakhimovsky Pr. 36, Moscow 117997, Russia

3. Laboratory of Integrated Research of Water Resources, S.Yu. Witte Moscow University, Second Kozhukhovsky Pr. 12, Build. 1, Moscow 115432, Russia

Abstract

Protected areas are referred to around the world as the basis of conservation strategies. Designation of marine protected areas (MPAs) is to preserve marine biodiversity and protect species, habitats in the seas, and oceans. The simulated annealing algorithm (SAA) with other algorithms (swap iterative improvement, normal followed by two step, two step iterative improvement, and normal iterative improvement) in MARXAN conservation solutions software and the multi-criteria evaluation (MCE) method were used to locate MPAs in the Southern Caspian Sea. Then, four methods were examined for site selection that include: (1) Simulated annealing algorithm, (2) MCE with zonal land suitability (ZLS), (3) MCE with compactness and contiguity, and (4) combined method of multi-criteria evaluation with spatial constraints and a simulated annealing algorithm (improved MCE). In the MCE method, we applied different weighted scenarios to locate MPAs. The criteria for determining the desired regions of MPAs included 12 factors gathered in three groups, including: (1) Ecological criteria (distribution of fish Huso huso, Acipenser persicus, Acipenser stellatus, Rutilus frisii kutum, and Alosa braschnikowi; location of coastal protected areas, distance from coastal rivers (Coastline), distance from estuaries and deltas); (2) Physical criteria (distance from the coast, shore sensitive areas); and (3) Socio-economic criteria (distance from densely populated coastal cities, distance from industries near the coast). The results of comparing the algorithms in MARXAN 4.0.6 software showed that the simulated annealing algorithm has a better ratio of border-length/area than other algorithms. Also, the combined method of MCE (improved MCE) selects the best protection patches in terms of location, taking into account the seascape ecology metrics (e.g., patch compactness, edge density, normalized entropy, area metric for patches). Moreover, the results of the comparison of four methods for proposing MPAs based on seascape metrics showed that the combined method of MCE considers a protection network with more contiguity and compactness than the simulated annealing algorithm. The use of seascape ecology can help to preserve and create larger and denser patches in the arrangement of protective areas, because such a selection of protective areas is nature-inspired and can be more bold and appropriate in the course of conservation planning.

Funder

Tarbiat Modares University

Russian Science Foundation Project

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Ocean Engineering,Water Science and Technology,Civil and Structural Engineering

Reference82 articles.

1. Conservation: Tactics for a constant crisis;Soule;Science,1991

2. Hutchinson’s duality: The once and future niche;Colwell;Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,2009

3. Measuring ecological niche overlap from occurrence and spatial environmental data;Broennimann;Global Ecol. Biogeogr.,2012

4. Oslo and Paris Conventions (OSPAR) (2022, June 30). Guidelines for the Identification and Selection of Marine Protected Areas in the OSPAR Maritime Area, Available online: https://jncc.defra.gov.uk/pdf/OSPAR_03-17e_GuidelinesIdentificationMPA.

5. Proposed criteria for assessing coastal-marine areas in order to determine the coastal-marine protected areas of Iran;Danehkar;J. Environ. Stud.,2004

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3