Affiliation:
1. Glenn Department of Civil Engineering, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA
2. National Center for Asphalt Technology, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36830, USA
Abstract
The work conducted in this study was designed to establish achievable testing tolerances for non-destructive pavement density measurements using Density Profiling Systems (DPSs). Nine and six sensors were used to determine the precision of repeatability and reproducibility in the laboratory and the field, respectively. A minimum of six sensors (considered in this study as independent laboratories) were needed to comply with the minimum number of participants required in the current ASTM standard practice (ASTM E691). The methodology included the development of laboratory precision evaluation with a total of nine sensors and two different mixtures (9.5 mm fine-graded mix, 19.0 mm coarse-graded mix) compacted at four density levels (97%, 94%, 91%, and 88% of Gmm). For the field portion of this study, pavement sections built at the National Center for Asphalt Technology (NCAT) Test Track in 2021 served as experimental variables. These sections were built with fine-graded asphalt mixtures and open-graded mixes as wearing courses. Additionally, the pavement sections included three underlying materials: new asphalt (binder layer), milled asphalt surface, and granular base, with thicknesses ranging from 3.8 to 13.9 cm. Density profile testing was conducted at two locations: within the mat (center of the lane) and along the joint. Computed precision statements regarding dielectric values within and between laboratories were about double for field results compared to laboratory results. However, when converted to density, the statements were significantly below the reported statements for Bulk Specific Gravity and Vacuum Sealing in the laboratory and Nuclear and Electromagnetic density gauges in the field.
Funder
Minnesota Department of Transportation
Reference13 articles.
1. Coreless compaction assessment—MnDOT 2019 case studies;Hoegh;Transp. Res. Rec.,2020
2. Enhanced model for continuous dielectric-based asphalt compaction evaluation;Hoegh;Transp. Res. Rec.,2018
3. ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials) (2020). Designation E691: Standard Practice for Conducting an Inter-Laboratory Study to Determine the Precision of a Test Method, ASTM.
4. Mickey, R.M., Dunn, O.J., and Clark, V.A. (2004). Analysis of Variance and Regression, John Wiley and Sons.
5. ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials) (2020). Designation E177: Practice for Use of the Terms Precision and Bias in ASTM Test Methods, ASTM.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献