Affiliation:
1. Department of Data Processing Automation, Tomsk State University of Control Systems and Radioelectronics, 634050 Tomsk, Russia
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to analyze the most popular maturity models in order to identify their strengths and weaknesses. Research conducted by international project management communities such as Software Engineering Institute (SEI), Project Management Institute (PMI), International Project Management Association (IPMA), Office of Government Commerce (OGC) and International Organization for Standardization (ISO) showed that organizations with high managerial maturity are more likely to achieve their planned project goals than those that do not identify and standardize their best management practices. This circumstance has encouraged scientists from all over the world to start developing various models that can measure and evaluate managerial maturity in projects. Nowadays, the variety of models created has led to considerable difficulty in understanding the strengths and weaknesses of each model. To solve this problem, the article authors conducted a critical analysis to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the most popular project management maturity models. The results obtained will be of interest to project managers, members of project teams, heads of organizations, project offices and everyone involved in the development of project activities. Based on the analysis, it was found that the most developed maturity models are based on international codes of knowledge of project management. Most maturity models ignore the presence of structural and infrastructural elements, such as a workplace, the necessary equipment and software, the availability of professional standards, instructions, regulations, etc. It was also revealed that there are no processes for assessing the effectiveness and efficiency of using the best practices in the maturity models.
Funder
Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation
Subject
Finance,Economics and Econometrics,Accounting,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
Reference30 articles.
1. Project maturity in organizations;Andersen;International Journal of Project Management Accounting,2003
2. Project management maturity models–A critical review: A case study within Swedish engineering and construction organizations;Backlund;Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences,2014
3. Project Management Maturity: Some Results from Indonesia;Bay;Journal of Building and Construction Management,2006
4. IPMA Delta® and IPMA Organisational Competence Baseline (OCB): New approaches in the field of project management maturity;Bushuyev;International Journal of Managing Projects in Business,2014
5. Crawford, James Kent (2007). Project Management Maturity Model, Auerbach Publications.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Assessing Digital Government Maturity Model for Developed Countries. Application to Singapore;2023 IEEE 6th International Conference on Cloud Computing and Artificial Intelligence: Technologies and Applications (CloudTech);2023-11-21
2. Conception of a Digital Government Maturity Model for Developing Countries. Application to Uruguay;2023 10th International Conference on Wireless Networks and Mobile Communications (WINCOM);2023-10-26
3. Assessing the Maturity Level of Risk Management in IT Projects;Sustainability;2023-08-23