Hedging Performance and Fair-Value Financial Reporting: Evidence from Bank Holding Companies

Author:

Zhou Hui1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Accounting & Finance, The University of Auckland, Auckland 1010, New Zealand

Abstract

This study investigates whether the inclusion of the fair-value-based hedging performance measure improves the value and risk relevance of accounting earnings using data from the regulatory filings of bank holding companies required by the Federal Reserve Bank. Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133 (SFAS 133) requires most types of hedge ineffectiveness to be measured on a fair value basis and reported in earnings. This earnings recognition requirement was the focal point of controversy surrounding the adoption of SFAS 133. This study provides new evidence that the fair-value-based earnings component required under SFAS has predictive power over future performance. I further show that incorporating this fair-value-based hedging performance measure helps improve the value and risk relevance of accounting earnings. The findings of this study help inform the broader debate over the effect of fair-value-based financial reporting on capital markets.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Finance,Economics and Econometrics,Accounting,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)

Reference35 articles.

1. Does recognition versus disclosure matter? Evidence from value-relevance of banks’ recognized and disclosed derivative financial instruments;Ahmed;The Accounting Review,2006

2. The cross-section of volatility and expected returns;Ang;Journal of Finance,2006

3. Fair value accounting: Effects on banks’ earnings volatility, regulatory capital, and value of contractual cash flows;Barth;Journal of Banking and Finance,1995

4. Value relevance of banks’ fair value disclosures under SFAS No. 107;Barth;The Accounting Review,1996

5. Market effects of recognition and disclosure;Barth;Journal of Accounting Research,2003

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3