Specificity Testing for NGT PCR-Based Detection Methods in the Context of the EU GMO Regulations

Author:

Zanatta Caroline Bedin1ORCID,Hoepers Aline Martins1ORCID,Nodari Rubens Onofre1ORCID,Agapito-Tenfen Sarah Zanon2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Crop Science, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis 88034000, Brazil

2. Climate and Environmental Division, NORCE Norwegian Research AS, 5008 Bergen, Norway

Abstract

The term new genomic techniques (NGTs) is an umbrella term used to describe a variety of techniques that can alter the genetic material of an organism and that have emerged or have been developed since 2001, when the existing genetically modified organism (GMO) legislation was adopted. The analytical framework used to detect GMOs in Europe is an established single harmonized procedure that is mandatory for the authorization of GM food and feed, thus generating a reliable, transparent, and effective labeling scheme for GMO products. However, NGT products can challenge the implementation and enforcement of the current regulatory system in the EU, relating in particular to the detection of NGT products that contain no foreign genetic material. Consequently, the current detection methods might fail to meet the minimum performance requirements. Although existing detection methods may be able to detect and quantify even small alterations in the genome, this does not necessarily confirm the distinction between products resulting from NGTs subject to the GMO legislation and other products. Therefore, this study provides a stepwise approach for the in silico prediction of PCR systems’ specificity by testing a bioinformatics pipeline for amplicon and primer set searches in current genomic databases. In addition, it also empirically tested the PCR system evaluated during the in silico analysis. Two mutant genotypes produced by CRISPR-Cas9 in Arabidopsis thaliana were used as a case study. Overall, our results demonstrate that the single PCR system developed for identifying a nucleotide insertion in the grf1-3 genotype has multiple matches in the databases, which do not enable the discrimination of this mutated event. Empirical assays further support this demonstration. In contrast, the second mutated genotype, grf8-61, which contains a -3 bp deletion, did not yield any matches in the sequence variant database. However, the primer sequences were not efficient during the empirical assay. Our approach represents a first step in decision making for analytical methods for NGT detection, identification, and quantification in light of the European labeling regulations.

Funder

National Council for Scientific and Technological Development

Coordenação de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior

The Research Council of Norway

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Plant Science,Health Professions (miscellaneous),Health (social science),Microbiology,Food Science

Reference37 articles.

1. European Commission (EC) (2022, November 06). Science for Environment Policy Future Brief: Synthetic Biology and Biodiversity. Available online: http://ec.europa.eu/science-environment-policy.

2. Detection and identification of genome editing in plants: Challenges and opportunities;Grohmann;Front. Plant Sci.,2019

3. Regulatory hurdles for genome editing: Process- vs. product-based approaches in different regulatory contexts;Sprink;Plant Cell Rep.,2016

4. European Court of Justice decision for genome editing: Consequences on food/feed risk assessment and detection;Broll;Food Control,2019

5. Genome-edited plants in the field;Sprink;Curr. Opin. Biotechnol.,2020

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3