Abstract
Arborists maintain trees in landscapes where failure can cause damage to infrastructure. Codominant branch unions are considered less stable than lateral branch unions. Previous research has found that unions can be considered codominant when aspect ratio is greater than 0.70 when included bark is present, yet it remains unclear if this threshold is reasonable in the absences of included bark. We utilized digital image correlation to measure strain (deformation) and separation angle to failure to better understand how mechanical loads move through Acer rubrum L. (red maple) branch unions. Strain was found to be higher in the branch regions in limb failure and ball and socket failure modes and strain was greater in the branch protection zone regions of imbedded and flat failures. Strain at failure was found to decrease with increasing aspect ratio, plateauing beyond aspect ratios of 0.83. In the absence of included bark, red maple branch unions appear to become codominant at aspect ratio of 0.83. We recommend that arborists should proactively manage to keep aspect ratios lower than 0.60 and consider mitigation options as aspect ratios approach 0.70.
Funder
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
European Commission
Reference56 articles.
1. Tree biomechanics: A white paper from the 2021 international meeting and research summit at the Morton Arboretum (Lisle, Illinois, U.S.);Dahle;Arboric. Urban For.,2014
2. Utility Tree Risk Assessment—Best Management Practices;Goodfellow,2020
3. Best Management Practices: Tree Risk Assessment;Smiley,2017
4. Tree Biomechanics Literature Review: Dynamics
5. A Review of Factors That Affect the Static Load-Bearing Capacity of Urban Trees
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献