A Mixture Quantitative Randomized Response Model That Improves Trust in RRT Methodology

Author:

Parker Michael1,Gupta Sat1,Khalil Sadia12

Affiliation:

1. Department of Mathematics and Statistics, College of Arts and Sciences, UNC Greensboro, Greensboro, NC 27412, USA

2. Department of Statistics, Lahore College for Women University, Lahore 54000, Pakistan

Abstract

The Quantitative Randomized Response Technique (RRT) can be used by researchers to obtain honest answers to questions that, due to their sensitive (socially undesirable, dangerous, or even illegal) nature, might otherwise invoke partially or completely falsified responses. Over the years, Quantitative RRT models, sometimes called Scrambling models, have been developed to incorporate such advancements as mixture, optionality and enhanced trust, each of which has important benefits. However, no single model incorporates all of these features. In this study, we propose just such a unified model, which we call the Mixture Optional Enhanced Trust (MOET) model. After developing methodologies to assess MOET based on standard approaches and using them to explore the key characteristics of the new model, we show that MOET has superior efficiency compared to the Quantitative Optional Enhanced Trust (OET) model. We also show that use of the model’s mixture capability allows practitioners to optimally balance the model’s efficiency with its privacy, making the model adaptable to a wide variety of research scenarios.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Geometry and Topology,Logic,Mathematical Physics,Algebra and Number Theory,Analysis

Reference16 articles.

1. Block total response as an alternative to the randomized response method in surveys;Raghavarao;J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B (Methodol.),1979

2. Development of a reliable and valid short form of the Marlowe-Crowne SDB scale;Reynolds;J. Clin. Psychol.,1982

3. The Bogus Pipeline: A new paradigm for measuring effect and attitude;Jones;Psychol. Bull.,1971

4. The Linear Randomized Response Model;Warner;J. Am. Stat. Assoc.,1971

5. The unrelated question randomized response model: Theoretical framework;Greenberg;J. Am. Stat. Assoc.,1971

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3