Phase-Dependent Differential In Vitro and Ex Vivo Susceptibility of Aspergillus flavus and Fusarium keratoplasticum to Azole Antifungals
-
Published:2023-09-26
Issue:10
Volume:9
Page:966
-
ISSN:2309-608X
-
Container-title:Journal of Fungi
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:JoF
Author:
Roberts Darby1ORCID, Salmon Jacklyn1, Cubeta Marc A.2, Gilger Brian C.1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27606, USA 2. Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Center for Integrated Fungal Research, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27606, USA
Abstract
Fungal keratitis (FK) is an invasive infection of the cornea primarily associated with Aspergillus and Fusarium species. FK is treated empirically with a limited selection of topical antifungals with varying levels of success. Though clinical infections are typically characterized by a dense network of mature mycelium, traditional models used to test antifungal susceptibility of FK isolates exclusively evaluate susceptibility in fungal cultures derived from asexual spores known as conidia. The purpose of this study was to characterize differences in fungal response when topical antifungal treatment is initiated at progressive phases of fungal development. We compared the efficacy of voriconazole and luliconazole against in vitro cultures of A. flavus and F. keratoplasticum at 0, 24, and 48 h of fungal development. A porcine cadaver corneal model was used to compare antifungal efficacy of voriconazole and luliconazole in ex vivo tissue cultures of A. flavus and F. keratoplasticum at 0, 24, and 48 h of fungal development. Our results demonstrate phase-dependent susceptibility of both A. flavus and F. keratoplasticum to both azoles in vitro as well as ex vivo. We conclude that traditional antifungal susceptibility testing with conidial suspensions does not correlate with fungal susceptibility in cultures of a more advanced developmental phase. A revised method of antifungal susceptibility testing that evaluates hyphal susceptibility may better predict fungal response in the clinical setting where treatment is often delayed until days after the initial insult.
Subject
Plant Science,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics,Microbiology (medical)
Reference33 articles.
1. Infectious keratitis: An update on epidemiology, causative microorganisms, risk factors, and antimicrobial resistance;Ting;Eye,2021 2. Hoffman, J.J., Burton, M.J., and Leck, A. (2021). Mycotic Keratitis—A Global Threat from the Filamentous Fungi. J. Fungi, 7. 3. Brown, L., Kamwiziku, G., Oladele, R.O., Burton, M.J., Prajna, N.V., Leitman, T.M., and Denning, D.W. (2022). The Case for Fungal Keratitis to Be Accepted as a Neglected Tropical Disease. J. Fungi, 8. 4. Ahmadikia, K., Gharehbolagh, S.A., Fallah, B., Eshkaleti, M.N., Malekifar, P., Rahsepar, S., Getso, M.I., Sharma, S., and Mahmoudi, S. (2021). Distribution, Prevalence, and Causative Agents of Fungal Keratitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (1990 to 2020). Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol., 11. 5. The Lancet Global Health Commission on Global Eye Health: Vision beyond 2020;Burton;Lancet Glob. Health,2021
|
|