Abstract
Built environment practitioners currently seek options and opportunities to respond to the biodiversity emergency. Biodiversity Inclusive Design (BID) is an approach to design that seeks to foster functional ecological systems, enable species’ persistence within the built environment and (re) connect people with nature. BID can support designers’ quest toward biodiversity positivity. However, design projects that prioritise biodiversity are sparse and are limited to ad hoc initiatives by individual champions rather than being standard practice. Frameworks providing a structured design process to achieve biodiversity positivity already exist, but they can be difficult to find, compare and navigate. Responding to calls to further develop the concept of Biodiversity Inclusive Design, we systematically analyse 15 design frameworks compatible with BID. We explore how existing design frameworks position biodiversity as a client. For each framework, we uncover the underlying rules, ideas, beliefs, design principles and proposed structure of the design process. Through a thematic analysis, we identify re-emerging concepts and themes underpinning BID. Nested within complementary design frameworks, we conclude by positioning BID as a set of parallel processes that specifically explore biodiversitys’ perspectives (needs, preferences) and how they interact with the socio-ecological system to give a voice to biodiversity within the planning and design process. Our paper formalises BID as a practice and identifies three core dimensions of design action and nine design principles.
Funder
Australian Research Council Discovery
Linkage
Ian Potter Foundation
Reference89 articles.
1. Cities should respond to the biodiversity extinction crisis;Oke;NPJ Urban Sustain.,2021
2. Seven lessons for planning nature-based solutions in cities;Frantzeskaki;Environ. Sci. Policy,2019
3. Lähde, E., Khadka, A., Tahvonen, O., and Kokkonen, T. (2019). Can we really have it all?—Designing multifunctionality with sustainable urban drainage system elements. Sustainability, 11.
4. Semeraro, T., Aretano, R., and Pomes, A. (2017). IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, IOP Publishing.
5. Colléony, A., and Shwartz, A. (2019). Beyond assuming co-benefits in nature-based solutions: A human-centered approach to optimize social and ecological outcomes for advancing sustainable urban planning. Sustainability, 11.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献