Exploring Effective Detection and Spatial Pattern of Prickly Pear Cactus (Opuntia Genus) from Airborne Imagery before and after Prescribed Fires in the Edwards Plateau

Author:

Jaime Xavier A.1ORCID,Angerer Jay P.2ORCID,Yang Chenghai3ORCID,Walker John4,Mata Jose1ORCID,Tolleson Doug R.5ORCID,Wu X. Ben1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Ecology and Conservation Biology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA

2. USDA Agricultural Research Service, Fort Keogh Livestock and Range Research Laboratory, Miles City, MT 59301, USA

3. USDA Agricultural Research Service, Aerial Application Technology Research Unit, College Station, TX 77845, USA

4. Texas A&M AgriLife Research, San Angelo, TX 76901, USA

5. Texas A&M AgriLife Research, Sonora, TX 76950, USA

Abstract

Over the past century, prickly pear (PP) cactus (e.g., genus Opuntia; subgenus Platyopuntia) has increased on semi-arid rangelands. Effective detection of cacti abundance and spatial pattern is challenging due to the inherent heterogeneity of rangeland landscapes. In this study, high-resolution multispectral imageries (0.21 m) were used to test object-based (OB) feature extraction, random forest (RF) machine learning, and spectral endmember (n-D) classification methods to map PP and evaluate its spatial pattern. We trained and tested classification methods using field-collected GPS location, plant cover, and spectrometry from 288 2 m radius polygons before a prescribed burn and 480 samples after the burn within a 69.2-ha burn unit. The most accurate classification method was then used to map PP distribution and quantify abundance before and after fire. As a case study, we assessed the spatial pattern of mapped PP cover, considering topoedaphic setting and burn conditions. The results showed that the endmember classification method, spectral angle mapper (SAM), outperformed the RF and OB classifications with higher kappa coefficients (KC) (0.93 vs. 0.82 and 0.23, respectively) and overall accuracies (OA) (0.96 vs. 0.91 and 0.49) from pre-fire imagery. KC and OA metrics of post-fire imagery were lower, but rankings among classification methods were similar. SAM classifications revealed that fire reduced PP abundance by 46.5%, but reductions varied by soil type, with deeper soils having greater decreases (61%). Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests indicated significant changes before and after fire in the frequency distribution of PP cover within deeper soils (D = 0.64, p = 0.02). A two-way ANOVA revealed that the interaction of season (pre- vs. post-fire) and soils significantly (p < 0.00001) influenced the spatial pattern of PP patches. Fire also reduced the size and shape of PP patches depending on the topoedaphic settings. This study provides an innovative and effective approach for integrating field data collection, remote sensing, and endmember classification methods to map prickly pear and assess the effects of prescribed fire on prickly pear spatial patterns. Accurate mapping of PP can aid in the design and implementation of spatially explicit rangeland management strategies, such as fire, that can help reduce and mitigate the ecological and economic impacts of prickly pear expansion.

Funder

U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Agriculture Research Service

National Institute of Food and Agriculture

Texas A&M University

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences

Reference99 articles.

1. Prickly pear management in south Texas;Hanselka;Rangel. Arch.,1994

2. Hart, C.R., and Lyons, R.K. (2010). Prickly Pear Biology and Management, Texas AgriLife Extension Service.

3. Long-term effects of fire on cactus in the southern mixed prairie of Texas;Bunting;Rangel. Ecol. Manag. Range Manag. Arch.,1980

4. Prickly pear cactus responses to summer and winter fires;Ansley;Rangel. Ecol. Manag.,2007

5. Briske, D.D. (2017). Rangeland Systems: Processes, Management and Challenges, Springer International Publishing.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3