Abstract
Prosthetic technology for people with missing limbs has made great progress in recent decades. However, acceptance rates and user satisfaction are not only dependent on technical aspects, but also to a great extent on social and psychological factors. We propose that these factors should receive greater attention in order to improve prosthetic care and give recommendations how to incorporate the findings from social science in research and development (R&D) and in care practice. Limited access due to high costs of new prosthetic technology combined with rising costs in health care systems in general is a further issue we address. Our legal and ethical analysis of the reimbursement process in Germany shows that this issue requires further empirical investigation, a stakeholder dialogue and maybe even policy changes. Social science knowledge and participatory methods are of high relevance to answer questions about the benefit of prosthetics for users, based on individual needs and preferences, which should be at the core of debates on ethical resource allocation.
Reference79 articles.
1. Implications of prosthesis funding structures on the use of prostheses
2. Mischpreis und Nutzenmonetarisierung: Zur neueren Rechtsprechung zum AMNOG-Verfahren;Huster;NZS,2017
3. Priorisierung im Gesundheitswesen: Was können wir aus den internationalen Erfahrungen lernen?
4. Priorisierung medizinischer Leistungen im System der Gesetzlichen Krankenversicherung (GKV): Stellungnahme;Dtsch. Ärzteblatt,2007
5. Kann Rationierung im Gesundheitswesen ethisch vertretbar sein?;Marckmann;GGW,2010
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献