Prediction of Extremely Severe Cyclonic Storm “Fani” Using Moving Nested Domain

Author:

Singh Kuvar Satya12ORCID,Nayak Sridhara3ORCID,Maity Suman4ORCID,Nayak Hara Prasad5ORCID,Dutta Soma6ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Center for Disaster Mitigation and Management (CDMM), Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore 632014, India

2. Department of Mathematics, School of Advanced Sciences (SAS), Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore 632014, India

3. Research and Development Center, Japan Meteorological Corporation Limited, Osaka 530-0011, Japan

4. Research Institute for Global Change, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology, Yokohama 236-0001, Japan

5. Department of Geography, University of California Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA

6. Wolkus Technology Solutions Pvt. Ltd., Bengaluru-560102, India

Abstract

The prediction of extremely severe cyclonic storms has been a long-standing and challenging issue due to their short life period and large variation in intensities over a short time. In this study, we predict the track, intensity, and structure of an extremely severe cyclonic storm (ESCS) named ‘Fani,’ which developed over the Bay of Bengal region from 27 April to 4 May 2019, using the Advanced Research version of the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF-ARW) model. Two numerical experiments were conducted using the moving nested domain method with a 3 km horizontal resolution, one with the FLUX-1 air-sea flux parameterization scheme and the other with the FLUX-2 air-sea flux parameterization scheme. The NCEP operational Global Forecast System (GFS) analysis and forecast datasets with a 25 km horizontal resolution were used to derive the initial and boundary conditions. The WRF model’s predicted track and intensity were validated with the best-fit track dataset from the India Meteorological Department (IMD), and the structure was validated with different observations. The results showed that the WRF model with the FLUX-1 air-sea parameterization scheme accurately predicted the track, landfall (position and time), and intensity (minimum sea level pressure and maximum surface wind) of the storm. The track errors on days 1 to 4 were approximately 47 km, 123 km, 96 km, and 27 km in the FLUX-1 experiment and approximately 54 km, 142 km, 152 km, and 166 km in the FLUX-2 experiment, respectively. The intensity was better predicted in the FLUX-1 experiment during the first 60 h, while it was better predicted in the FLUX-2 experiment for the remaining period. The structure, in terms of relative humidity, water vapor, maximum reflectivity, and temperature anomaly of the storm, was also discussed and compared with available satellite and Doppler Weather Radar observations.

Funder

DST-SERB

VIT SEED

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Atmospheric Science,Environmental Science (miscellaneous)

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

全球学者库

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"全球学者库"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前全球学者库共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2023 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3