Affiliation:
1. Catedrático CONACYT-Coordinación para la Innovación y Aplicación de la Ciencia y la Tecnología (CIACYT), Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, Avenida Sierra Leona No. 550, San Luis Potosí 78210, Mexico
2. Laboratorio Nacional de Geoprocesamiento de Información Fitosanitaria, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, Avenida Sierra Leona No. 550, San Luis Potosí 78210, Mexico
3. División de Ciencias Básicas e Ingeniería, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana—Azcapotzalco, Avenida San Pablo 180, Azcapotzalco, Cd. México 02200, Mexico
4. Instituto de Física, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Mexico, Circuito Investigación Científica S/N, Ciudad Universitaria, Coyoacán, Cd. México 04510, Mexico
Abstract
In growing Mexican cities, there are few studies on air pollution, especially on the topic of characterization for the chemical composition of Particulate Matter (PM). This work presents an X-ray Fluorescence (XRF) analysis and Total Carbon analysis of PM2.5 in a two-year monitoring campaign from 20 May 2017 to 30 July 2018, collecting 96 daily samples in the northeast area of San Luis Potosi city to reconstruct the gravimetric mass and perform a source apportionment study using the Positive Matrix Factorization model (PMF). Concentration differences were due to different yearly seasons. In the year 2017, there was a major influence on heavy metals (V, Cr, Mn, Ni, Cu, Zn, Pb), and for the year 2018, there was a major crustal elements concentration (Na, Al, Si, P). Heavy metal concentrations are higher than any worldwide regulation limit. After applying these methods to the 49 samples collected for the year 2017, the mass reconstruction was nearly 70% of the gravimetric mass. XRF analysis quantified 17 elements (Na, Mg, Al, Si, P, S, Cl, K, Ca, Ti, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Ni, Cu, Zn) in addition to Total Carbon (Organic Carbon (OC) + Elemental Carbon (EC)). PMF receptor model was applied to identify possible contribution sources and resolved seven physically interpretable factors that contributed to the ambient particulate pollution at the sampling site: Urban Dust (24.2%), Mobile Sources (22.2%), Chemical industry (18.2%), Oil combustion (16.3%), Smelting Industry (12.4%), Fuel Oil + Ceramic Industry (4.4%), and Braking (2.3%). However, the brick kiln’s emissions may be present in at least four of the emission sources due to several types of combustible employed.
Funder
Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología
Subject
Atmospheric Science,Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
Reference74 articles.
1. Initial steps of aerosol growth;Kulmala;Atmos. Chem. Phys.,2004
2. WHO (2013). WHO Health Aspects of Air Pollution with Particulate Matter, Ozone and Nitrogen Dioxide, Report on a WHO Working Group.
3. Seinfeld, J.H., and Pandis, S.N. (2006). Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: From Air Pollution to Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.. [2nd ed.].
4. Bounding the role of black carbon in the climate system: A scientific assesment;Bond;J. Geophys. Res.,2013
5. A critical review of the variation in rainwater acidity in 24 Chinese cities during 1982–2018;Qu;Elem. Sci. Anthr.,2021