Affiliation:
1. School of Geophysics and Geomatics, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China
2. State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
3. National Satellite Ocean Application Service, Ministry of Natural Resources, Beijing 100081, China
Abstract
High-resolution and thermal infrared hyperspectral data acquired from the Thermal Infrared Airborne Spectrographic Imager (TASI) have been recognized as efficient tools in geology, demonstrating significant potential for rock discernment. Deep learning (DL), as an advanced technology, has driven substantial advancements in lithological mapping by automatically extracting high-level semantic features from images to enhance recognition accuracy. However, gathering sufficient high-quality lithological samples for model training is challenging in many scenarios, posing limitations for data-driven DL approaches. Moreover, existing sample collection approaches are plagued by limited verifiability, subjective bias, and variation in the spectra of the same class at different locations. To tackle these challenges, a novel sample generation method called multi-lithology spectra sample selection (MLS3) is first employed. This method involves multiple steps: multiple spectra extraction, spectra combination and optimization, lithological type identification, and sample selection. In this study, the TASI hyperspectral data collected from the Liuyuan area in Gansu Province, China, were used as experimental data. Samples generated based on MLS3 were fed into five typical DL models, including two-dimensional convolutional neural network (2D-CNN), hybrid spectral CNN (HybridSN), multiscale residual network (MSRN), spectral-spatial residual network (SSRN), and spectral partitioning residual network (SPRN) for lithological mapping. Among these models, the accuracy of the SPRN reaches 84.03%, outperforming the other algorithms. Furthermore, MLS3 demonstrates superior performance, achieving an overall accuracy of 2.25–6.96% higher than other sample collection methods when SPRN is used as the DL framework. In general, MLS3 enables both the quantity and quality of samples, providing inspiration for the application of DL to hyperspectral lithological mapping.
Funder
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Open Fund of Wenzhou Future City Research
Hebei Key Laboratory of Ocean Dynamics, Resources and Environments
Open Fund of State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science
Global Change and Air-Sea Interaction II
Open Fund of Key Laboratory of Space Ocean Remote Sensing and Application, MNR
Foundation of State Key Laboratory of Public Big Data
Open Fund of Key Laboratory of Regional Development and Environmental Response
Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, China University of Geosciences
Reference61 articles.
1. Using Remote Sensing Data for Geological Mapping in Semi-Arid Environment: A Machine Learning Approach;Earth Sci. Inform.,2022
2. A Survey of Machine Learning and Deep Learning in Remote Sensing of Geological Environment: Challenges, Advances, and Opportunities;Han;ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens.,2023
3. A Review of Machine Learning in Processing Remote Sensing Data for Mineral Exploration;Shirmard;Remote Sens. Environ.,2022
4. Mapping Alteration Minerals Using Sub-Pixel Unmixing of ASTER Data in the Sarduiyeh Area, SE Kerman, Iran;Hosseinjani;Int. J. Digit. Earth,2011
5. Spectral Indices Derived, Non-Parametric Decision Tree Classification Approach to Lithological Mapping in the Lake Magadi Area, Kenya;Kodikara;Int. J. Digit. Earth,2018