Affiliation:
1. Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Konya Technical University, Konya 42250, Türkiye
2. Academy of Land Registry and Cadastre, Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli University, Ankara 06560, Türkiye
Abstract
Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) are now widely preferred systems that are capable of rapid mapping and generating topographic models with relatively high positional accuracy. Since the integrated GNSS receivers of UAVs do not allow for sufficiently accurate outcomes either horizontally or vertically, a conventional method is to use ground control points (GCPs) to perform bundle block adjustment (BBA) of the outcomes. Since the number of GCPs to be installed limits the process in UAV operations, there is an important research question whether the precise point positioning (PPP) method can be an alternative when the real-time kinematic (RTK), network RTK, and post-process kinematic (PPK) techniques cannot be used to measure GCPs. This study introduces a novel approach using precise point positioning with ambiguity resolution (PPP-AR) for ground control point (GCP) positioning in UAV photogrammetry. For this purpose, the results are evaluated by comparing the horizontal and vertical coordinates obtained from the 24 h GNSS sessions of six calibration pillars in the field and the horizontal length differences obtained by electronic distance measurement (EDM). Bartlett’s test is applied to statistically determine the accuracy of the results. The results indicate that the coordinates obtained from a two-hour PPP-AR session show no significant difference from those acquired in a 30 min session, demonstrating PPP-AR to be a viable alternative for GCP positioning. Therefore, the PPP technique can be used for the BBA of GCPs to be established for UAVs in large-scale map generation. However, the number of GCPs to be selected should be four or more, which should be homogeneously distributed over the study area.
Reference47 articles.
1. Accuracy of digital surface models and orthophotos derived from unmanned aerial vehicle photogrammetry;J. Surv. Eng.,2017
2. Assessment of UAV-based digital surface model and the effects of quantity and distribution of ground control points;Amorim;Int. J. Remote Sens.,2020
3. Comparison of DEM based on Geodetic Methods and Photogrammetric Usage of UAV;Makineci;Turk. J. Remote Sens.,2020
4. Investigation of Position Accuracy in UAVs;Yildirim;Turk. J. Remote Sens.,2023
5. Accuracy of UAV-based DEMs without ground control points;Geoinformatica,2024