Design Optimization and Finite Element Model Validation of LPBF-Printed Lattice-Structured Beams

Author:

Rashid Riyan12,Masood Syed1ORCID,Ruan Dong1ORCID,Palanisamy Suresh12ORCID,Huang Xiaodong1,Rahman Rashid Rizwan Abdul12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Engineering, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, VIC 3122, Australia

2. DMTC Ltd., Hawthorn, VIC 3122, Australia

Abstract

The laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) method, more commonly known as selective laser melting (SLM), is one of the most common metal additive manufacturing (AM) processes. It is a layer-by-layer fabrication process where each powder layer is melted and fused by a laser beam, which traverses over the designated part geometry cross-section, as defined by a sliced CAD model. The LPBF process is being popularly used to manufacture end products of intricate geometry for various industries, such as the automobile, aerospace, defence, and biomedical industries. In designing parts, the topology optimisation (TO) technique can be effectively employed to optimise the distribution of material throughout the part and obtain the minimum volume/weight without compromising the mechanical performance of the component. This study focusses on the design optimisation and validation of the optimisation approaches used for LPBF-printed AlSi12 metal parts. The mechanical performance of three different topologically optimised lattice beams, viz. 1 × 1, 8 × 3, and 12 × 3, printed using the LPBF process, was investigated. When the beams were tested in bending, it was found that these TO LPBF-printed beams behaved differently when compared to the LPBF-printed solid beam. The 1 × 1 lattice beam performed better than the other two lattice beams due to the lower number of links where premature failure was delayed. The 1 × 1 lattice beam exhibited a load-bearing capacity of 17 ± 2 kN, whereas the 8 × 3 and 12 × 3 lattice beams showed load capacities of 13 ± 1 kN and 10 ± 1 kN, respectively. This mechanical behaviour was modelled and simulated by using a finite element analysis, and it was found that the LPBF-printed material property was affected by the design elements present in the beam. It was also found that each topology-optimised beam fits a different material model when compared to the SLM-printed solid beam. Therefore, a new material model or simulation technique needs to be developed to overcome this issue.

Funder

DMTC Ltd.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Materials Science,Metals and Alloys

Reference39 articles.

1. Kladovasilakis, N., Tsongas, K., Karalekas, D., and Tzetzis, D. (2022). Architected Materials for Additive Manufacturing: A Comprehensive Review. Materials, 15.

2. Rashid, R., Masood, S.H., Ruan, D., Palanisamy, S., Huang, X., and Rahman Rashid, R.A. (2018, January 13–15). Topology Optimisation of Additively Manufactured Lattice Beams for Three-Point Bending Test. In Proceedings of 2018 International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, Austin, Austin, TX, USA.

3. Topology optimization approaches;Sigmund;Struct. Multidiscip. Optim.,2013

4. Structural Multi-objective Topology Optimization in the Design and Additive Manufacturing of Spatial Structure Joints;Liu;Int. J. Steel Struct.,2022

5. Aremu, A., Ashcroft, I., Hague, R., Wildman, R., and Tuck, C. (2010, January 9–11). Suitability of SIMP and BESO Topology Optimization Algorithms for Additive Manufacture. In Proceedings of 21st Annual International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, Austin, TX, USA.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3