CentralBark Image Dataset and Tree Species Classification Using Deep Learning
-
Published:2024-04-27
Issue:5
Volume:17
Page:179
-
ISSN:1999-4893
-
Container-title:Algorithms
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Algorithms
Author:
Warner Charles1, Wu Fanyou1ORCID, Gazo Rado1, Benes Bedrich2ORCID, Kong Nicole3ORCID, Fei Songlin1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Department of Forestry and Natural Resources, Purdue University, 175 Marsteller Street, West Lafayette, IN 47906, USA 2. Department of Computer Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47906, USA 3. Department of Library Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47906, USA
Abstract
The task of tree species classification through deep learning has been challenging for the forestry community, and the lack of standardized datasets has hindered further progress. Our work presents a solution in the form of a large bark image dataset called CentralBark, which enhances the deep learning-based tree species classification. Additionally, we have laid out an efficient and repeatable data collection protocol to assist future works in an organized manner. The dataset contains images of 25 central hardwood and Appalachian region tree species, with over 19,000 images of varying diameters, light, and moisture conditions. We tested 25 species: elm, oak, American basswood, American beech, American elm, American sycamore, bitternut hickory, black cherry, black locust, black oak, black walnut, eastern cottonwood, hackberry, honey locust, northern red oak, Ohio buckeye, Osage-orange, pignut hickory, sassafras, shagbark hickory silver maple, slippery elm, sugar maple, sweetgum, white ash, white oak, and yellow poplar. Our experiment involved testing three different models to assess the feasibility of species classification using unaltered and uncropped images during the species-classification training process. We achieved an overall accuracy of 83.21% using the EfficientNet-b3 model, which was the best of the three models (EfficientNet-b3, ResNet-50, and MobileNet-V3-small), and an average accuracy of 80.23%.
Reference24 articles.
1. Deep BarkID: A portable tree bark identification system by knowledge distillation;Wu;Eur. J. For. Res.,2021 2. Wendel, A., Sternig, S., and Godec, M. (2011, January 2–4). 3D Geometric Shape Modeling by ‘3D Contour Cloud’ Reconstruction from Stereo Videos. Proceedings of the 16th Computer Vision Winter Workshop, Mitterberg, Austria. 3. Carpentier, M., Giguere, P., and Gaudreault, J. (2018, January 1–5). Tree Species Identification from Bark Images Using Convolutional Neural Networks. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Madrid, Spain. 4. Fine-grained recognition of plants from images;Matas;Plant Methods,2017 5. Chi, Z., Houqiang, L., and Chao, W. (2003, January 14–17). Plant species recognition based on bark patterns using novel Gabor filter banks. Proceedings of the 2003 International Conference on Neural Networks and Signal Processing, Nanjing, China.
|
|