Geophysical Survey as Part of Rescue Archaeological Excavation on Large Construction Projects—Case Study: Road I/16 Slaný–Velvary (Czech Republic)

Author:

Tencer Tomáš1ORCID,Malyková Drahomíra2,Milo Peter1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Archaeology and Museology, Faculty of Arts, Masaryk University, Arna Nováka 1/1, 602 00 Brno, Czech Republic

2. Institute of Archaeology Prague of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Letenská 4, 118 00 Prague, Czech Republic

Abstract

Regions densely populated with archaeological monuments pose significant challenges for construction investors and archaeologists during the planning stages of major construction projects. Recognising the archaeological potential of these areas is crucial for planning effective rescue excavations, which have become a standard procedure in construction. This study explores the utility of non-invasive prospection techniques, including artefact field surveys, multispectral imaging, and magnetic surveys, in assessing the area chosen for the I/16 Slaný–Velvary road construction. We specifically focused on the contributions these methods make towards understanding the archaeological context of the proposed construction site. The findings from the magnetic survey were compared with the results of actual archaeological excavations. Through manual visual analysis and statistical spatial correlation, we assessed the effectiveness of the magnetic survey. The ability of magnetic survey to locate different types of archaeological objects proved to be dependent on various factors. The variability of the environmental setting, particularly pedological and geological conditions, is essential. However, the modern anthropogenic impact and the very nature of individual archaeological objects, especially their dimensions, also play an essential role.

Funder

Technology Agency of the Czech Republic under the TAČR ÉTA

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference34 articles.

1. Clark, A.J. (2003). Seeing Beneath the Soil: Prospecting Methods in Archaeology, Taylor & Francis e-Library.

2. David, A., Linford, N., and Linford, P. (2008). Geophysical Survey in Archaeological Field Evaluation, English Heritage. [2nd ed.].

3. Schmidt, A.R., Linford, P., Linford, N., David, A., Gaffney, C.F., Sarris, A., and Fassbinder, J. (2016). Eac Guidelines 2, Europae Archaeologia Consilium (EAC).

4. Durrington walls and the Stonehenge Hidden Landscape Project 2010–2016;Gaffney;Archaeol. Prospect.,2018

5. Kamermans, H., Gojda, M., and Posluschny, A. (2014). A Sense of the Past: Studies in Current Archaeological Applications of Remote Sensing and Non-Invasive Prospection Methods, Archaeopress.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3