Precise Adverse Weather Characterization by Deep-Learning-Based Noise Processing in Automotive LiDAR Sensors
-
Published:2024-06-30
Issue:13
Volume:16
Page:2407
-
ISSN:2072-4292
-
Container-title:Remote Sensing
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Remote Sensing
Author:
Kettelgerdes Marcel12ORCID, Sarmiento Nicolas2, Erdogan Hüseyin3, Wunderle Bernhard4, Elger Gordon12ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Institute of Innovative Mobility (IIMo), University of Applied Sciences Ingolstadt, Esplanade 10, 85049 Ingolstadt, Germany 2. Institute for Transportation and Infrastructure Systems (IVI), Fraunhofer Society, Stauffenbergstraße 2, 85051 Ingolstadt, Germany 3. Autonomous Mobility Division, Conti Temic Microelectronic GmbH, Ringlerstraße 17, 85057 Ingolstadt, Germany 4. Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology, Chemnitz University of Technology, Reichenhainer Str. 70, 09126 Chemnitz, Germany
Abstract
With current advances in automated driving, optical sensors like cameras and LiDARs are playing an increasingly important role in modern driver assistance systems. However, these sensors face challenges from adverse weather effects like fog and precipitation, which significantly degrade the sensor performance due to scattering effects in its optical path. Consequently, major efforts are being made to understand, model, and mitigate these effects. In this work, the reverse research question is investigated, demonstrating that these measurement effects can be exploited to predict occurring weather conditions by using state-of-the-art deep learning mechanisms. In order to do so, a variety of models have been developed and trained on a recorded multiseason dataset and benchmarked with respect to performance, model size, and required computational resources, showing that especially modern vision transformers achieve remarkable results in distinguishing up to 15 precipitation classes with an accuracy of 84.41% and predicting the corresponding precipitation rate with a mean absolute error of less than 0.47 mm/h, solely based on measurement noise. Therefore, this research may contribute to a cost-effective solution for characterizing precipitation with a commercial Flash LiDAR sensor, which can be implemented as a lightweight vehicle software feature to issue advanced driver warnings, adapt driving dynamics, or serve as a data quality measure for adaptive data preprocessing and fusion.
Funder
German Federal Ministry of Digital and Transport German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Climate Action
Reference65 articles.
1. Goelles, T., Schlager, B., and Muckenhuber, S. (2020). Fault Detection, Isolation, Identification and Recovery (FDIIR) Methods for Automotive Perception Sensors Including a Detailed Literature Survey for Lidar. Sensors, 20. 2. Kettelgerdes, M., Hirmer, T., Hillmann, T., Erdogan, H., Wunderle, E., and Elger, G. (2024, January 17). Accelerated Real-Life Testing of Automotive LiDAR Sensors as Enabler for In-Field Condition Monitoring. Proceedings of the Symposium Elektronik und Systemintegration. Hochschule Landshut/Cluster Mikrosystemtechnik, Landshut, Germany. 3. Kettelgerdes, M., Hillmann, T., Hirmer, T., Erdogan, H., Wunderle, B., and Elger, G. (2023). Accelerated Real-Life (ARL) Testing and Characterization of Automotive LiDAR Sensors to facilitate the Development and Validation of Enhanced Sensor Models. arXiv. 4. Strasser, A., Stelzer, P., Steger, C., and Druml, N. (2020, January 9–11). Enabling Live State-of-Health Monitoring for a Safety-Critical Automotive LiDAR System. Proceedings of the SAS—2020 IEEE Sensors Applications Symposium, Piscataway, NJ, USA. 5. Bijelic, M., Gruber, T., and Ritter, W. (2018, January 26–30). A Benchmark for Lidar Sensors in Fog: Is Detection Breaking Down?. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), Changshu, China.
|
|