Substitute Buttons: Exploring Tactile Perception of Physical Buttons for Use as Haptic Proxies
-
Published:2024-02-20
Issue:3
Volume:8
Page:15
-
ISSN:2414-4088
-
Container-title:Multimodal Technologies and Interaction
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:MTI
Author:
van Deurzen Bram1ORCID, Rovelo Ruiz Gustavo Alberto1ORCID, Bot Daniël M.2ORCID, Vanacken Davy1ORCID, Luyten Kris1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. UHasselt—Flanders Make, Expertise Centre for Digital Media, 3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium 2. UHasselt, Data Science Institute, 3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium
Abstract
Buttons are everywhere and are one of the most common interaction elements in both physical and digital interfaces. While virtual buttons offer versatility, enhancing them with realistic haptic feedback is challenging. Achieving this requires a comprehensive understanding of the tactile perception of physical buttons and their transferability to virtual counterparts. This research investigates tactile perception concerning button attributes such as shape, size, and roundness and their potential generalization across diverse button types. In our study, participants interacted with each of the 36 buttons in our search space and provided a response to which one they thought they were touching. The findings were used to establish six substitute buttons capable of effectively emulating tactile experiences across various buttons. In a second study, these substitute buttons were validated against virtual buttons in VR. Highlighting the potential use of the substitute buttons as haptic proxies for applications such as encountered-type haptics.
Funder
Flemish Government Special Research Fund (BOF) of Hasselt Univer
Reference47 articles.
1. Joyce, R.D., and Robinson, S. (2017, January 9–13). Passive Haptics to Enhance Virtual Reality Simulations. Proceedings of the AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference, Grapevine, TX, USA. 2. Insko, B.E. (2001). Passive Haptics Significantly Enhances Virtual Environments, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. 3. Muender, T., Reinschluessel, A.V., Drewes, S., Wenig, D., Döring, T., and Malaka, R. (2019, January 4–9). Does It Feel Real? Using Tangibles with Different Fidelities to Build and Explore Scenes in Virtual Reality. Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Glasgow, UK. CHI ’19. 4. Arora, J., Saini, A., Mehra, N., Jain, V., Shrey, S., and Parnami, A. (2019, January 4–9). VirtualBricks: Exploring a Scalable, Modular Toolkit for Enabling Physical Manipulation in VR. Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Glasgow, UK. CHI ’19. 5. Schulz, P., Alexandrovsky, D., Putze, F., Malaka, R., and Schöning, J. (2019, January 4–9). The Role of Physical Props in VR Climbing Environments. Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems—CHI ’19, Glasgow, UK.
|
|