Production Strategy and Technology Innovation under Different Carbon Emission Polices

Author:

Mu Yinping1,Zhao Juan2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Yangtze Delta Region Institute (Huzhou), University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Huzhou 313001, China

2. School of Management and Economics, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, China

Abstract

Given that the production process in the manufacturing industry is a significant contributor to carbon emissions, many governments have implemented carbon emission-related policies to incentivize manufacturers to optimize their production process or invest in green production technology, with the aim of reducing their carbon footprint. Therefore, it is necessary to determine the effectiveness of carbon policies considering manufacturers always tend to prioritize economic profits in their actual operations. We compare the effects of three different carbon emission policies—carbon tax, cap-and-trade, and intensity target—on manufacturers’ production strategies and technology innovation investments, which include production and carbon emission quantities, price of goods and emission permit, and technological innovation of the production improvement and the emission abatement. The study results show that the intensity target policy increases the carbon market price and decreases the carbon emission rate. For the manufacturers with higher (lower) initial emission intensity, intensity target policy induces them to decrease (increase) production quantities and carbon emission quantities. For the technology innovation choice, cap-and-trade induces more incentive on production improvement technology innovation for manufacturers with lower initial emission intensity and carbon emission abatement technology innovation for manufacturers with higher level initial emission intensity.

Funder

National Key Research and Development Program of China

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Geography, Planning and Development,Building and Construction

Reference39 articles.

1. Stavins, R.N. (2019). Carbon Taxes vs. Cap and Trade: Theory and Practice, Harvard Project on Climate Agreements.

2. Ramstein, C., Dominioni, G., Ettehad, S., Lam, L., Quant, M., Zhang, J., Mark, L., Nierop, S., Berg, T., and Leuschner, P. (2019). State and Trends of Carbon Pricing 2019, The World Bank.

3. Production strategy selection and carbon emission reduction with consumer heterogeneity under cap-and-trade regulation;Li;Complexity,2022

4. Jaller, M., and Matthews, S. (2021, June 25). Reducing Carbon Emissions Is Important. But Tackling Carbon Intensity Might Be Even More. Available online: https://fortune.com/2021/06/25/carbon-intensity-emissions-climate-change-paris-agreement/.

5. Petersen, T. (2023, June 05). Making CO2 Pricing Socially Just. Available online: https://www.ips-journal.eu/topics/economy-and-ecology/making-CO2-pricing-socially-just-5378/.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3