Affiliation:
1. Frankfurt Zoological Society, Ukrainian Branch, Koliivshchyny sq.1/3, 79008 Lviv, Ukraine
2. Wildland Research Institute, School of Geography, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
Abstract
This paper presents an updated wilderness quality map, WQI 2.0, for Europe, which extends the existing map (WQI 1.0) to include non-EU states in Eastern Europe. The analysis utilizes the Google Earth Engine (GEE) cloud platform and incorporates contemporary datasets to assess wilderness quality across the continent. WQI 2.0 is compared to the previous version from the EU Wilderness register and global data from the WCS Human Influence Index (HII). Results indicate a high level of consistency between the versions, validating the robustness of the approach and the value of up-to-date datasets. WQI 2.0 serves as a valuable tool for developing a coordinated European policy on wilderness protection, encompassing both EU and non-EU states. By identifying areas outside current protected boundaries, the map helps to identify regions at risk of degradation and loss, due to resource exploitation. While small changes are seen between WQI 1.0 and WQI 2.0, expanding the coverage over the whole of continental Europe provides a foundation for the longer-term monitoring and evaluation of conservation targets. The findings contribute to meeting international commitments, such as the COP15 Kunming–Montreal Agreement and CBD targets, by highlighting the importance of preserving intact wilderness areas and increasing protected areas through restoration and rewilding efforts. Future iterations, such as WQI 3.0+, can track trends and potential threats to wilderness areas, while also identifying opportunities for ecosystem recovery through restoration and rewilding. To ensure comprehensive coverage, there is a need to update the existing Wilderness Register 1.0 and expand its scope to include non-EU states. This can be facilitated through collaboration with national WQI mapping programs, building on the experiences of countries such as Scotland, France, Iceland, and Germany, which have well-established national mapping initiatives. Overall, WQI 2.0 and the proposed updates provide valuable tools for informed decision-making in wilderness conservation and restoration efforts across Europe.
Funder
Frankfurt Zoological Society and the University of Leeds
Reference34 articles.
1. Pérez-Hämmerle, K.V., Moon, K., Venegas-Li, R., Maxwell, S., Simmonds, J.S., Venter, O., Garnett, S.T., Possingham, H.P., and Watson, J.E. (2022). Wilderness forms and their implications for global environmental policy and conservation. Conserv. Biol., 36.
2. Convention on Biological Diversity (2023, July 22). First Draft of the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework-2017. Available online: https://www.cbd.int/doc/c/abb5/591f/2e46096d3f0330b08ce87a45/wg2020-03-03-en.pdf.
3. The wilderness continuum concept and its implications for Australian wilderness preservation policy;Lesslie;Biol. Conserv.,1985
4. A computer-based method of wilderness evaluation;Lesslie;Environ. Conserv.,1988
5. Review of status and conservation of wild land in Europe;Fisher;Rep. Wildland Res. Inst. Univ. Leedsuk,2010
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献