Predictive Quality Analytics of Surface Roughness in Turning Operation Using Polynomial and Artificial Neural Network Models
-
Published:2024-01-18
Issue:1
Volume:12
Page:206
-
ISSN:2227-9717
-
Container-title:Processes
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Processes
Author:
Bober Peter1ORCID, Zgodavová Kristína2ORCID, Čička Miroslav3, Mihaliková Mária2ORCID, Brindza Jozef3
Affiliation:
1. Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Informatics, Technical University of Košice, 042 00 Košice, Slovakia 2. Faculty of Materials, Metallurgy and Recycling, Technical University of Košice, 042 00 Košice, Slovakia 3. Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Košice, 042 00 Košice, Slovakia
Abstract
The variability of the material properties of steel from different suppliers causes problems in achieving the required surface quality after turning. Therefore, the manufacturer needs to estimate the resulting quality before starting production, especially if it is an expensive, small-batch production from stainless steel. Predictive models will make it possible to estimate the surface roughness from the mechanical properties of steel and thus support decision making about supplier selection or acceptance of a material supply. This research presents a step-by-step decision-making procedure, which enables the trained staff to make quick decisions based on commonly available information in the Mill Test Certificate (MTC). A new multivariate second-order polynomial model and feedforward backpropagation artificial neural network (ANN) models have been developed using input variables from the MTC: Tensile Strength, Yield Strength, Elongation, and Hardness. Models were used to enhance the methodological robustness in formulating the decision if the predicted surface roughness is outside the required range, even before accepting the delivery. Both models can accurately predict surface roughness, while the ANN model is more accurate than the polynomial model; however, the predictive model is sensitive to the accuracy of the input data, and the model’s prediction is valid only under precisely defined conditions.
Reference41 articles.
1. Küpper, D., Knizek, C., Ryeson, D., and Noecker, J. (2019, August 20). Quality 4.0 Takes More Than Technology. Available online: https://www.bcg.com/publications/2019/quality-4.0-takes-more-than-technology. 2. Decision Making in Predictive Maintenance: Literature Review and Research Agenda for Industry 4.0;Bousdekis;IFAC-Pap.,2019 3. (2023, August 24). Open Technologies Home Page, Predictive Quality. Available online: https://oden.io/solutions/predictive-quality-manufacturing/. 4. Decision Models for Supplier Selection in Industry 4.0 Era: A Systematic Literature Review;Resende;Procedia Manuf.,2021 5. Santos, G., Sá, J.C., Félix, M.J., Barreto, L., Carvalho, F., Doiro, M., Zgodavová, K., and Stefanović, M. (2021). New Needed Quality Management Skills for Quality Managers 4.0. Sustainability, 13.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|