Improving Balance and Functional Status in Spinal Cord Injury Patients: A Systematic Review Comparing Virtual Reality-Based Therapy and Conventional Therapeutic Exercises

Author:

Obrero-Gaitán Esteban1ORCID,López-Nájera Luis1,Piñar-Lara Marina1,Ibancos-Losada María del Rocío1ORCID,Cortés-Pérez Irene1ORCID,García-López Héctor2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Jaén, Campus Las Lagunillas s/n, 23071 Jaén, Spain

2. Faculty of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Medicine, University of Almería, Ctra Sacramento s/n, La Cañada de San Urbano, 04120 Almería, Spain

Abstract

Background: The objective was to evaluate the efficacy of virtual reality-based therapy (VRBT) compared to therapeutic exercise in increasing balance and functional status in patients with acquired spinal cord injury (SCI). Methods: Following PRISMA recommendations, we searched randomized controlled trials that meets the inclusion criteria in PubMed Medline, Scopus, Web of Science and PEDro without language and publication date limitations. Methodological quality and risk of bias were evaluated using the PEDro scale. Results: Six RCTs providing data on 131 patients with SCI were included in this systematic review. Based on the information gathered from the included studies, both therapies can increase balance and functional status between pre- and post-assessment. However, it seems that there is a higher rate of improvement in balance and function in SCI patients in favor of the group that uses VRBT in their treatment (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Although there is evidence in favor of the effectiveness of VRBT in increasing balance and functional status in patients with SCI, this is limited, and further research is necessary. Even so, taking into account the results found, our systematic review suggests that VRBT provides an effective therapeutic use to implement alongside conventional therapies for patients with SCI.

Publisher

MDPI AG

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3