Improving Balance and Functional Status in Spinal Cord Injury Patients: A Systematic Review Comparing Virtual Reality-Based Therapy and Conventional Therapeutic Exercises
-
Published:2024-07-02
Issue:13
Volume:13
Page:2594
-
ISSN:2079-9292
-
Container-title:Electronics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Electronics
Author:
Obrero-Gaitán Esteban1ORCID, López-Nájera Luis1, Piñar-Lara Marina1, Ibancos-Losada María del Rocío1ORCID, Cortés-Pérez Irene1ORCID, García-López Héctor2ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Jaén, Campus Las Lagunillas s/n, 23071 Jaén, Spain 2. Faculty of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Medicine, University of Almería, Ctra Sacramento s/n, La Cañada de San Urbano, 04120 Almería, Spain
Abstract
Background: The objective was to evaluate the efficacy of virtual reality-based therapy (VRBT) compared to therapeutic exercise in increasing balance and functional status in patients with acquired spinal cord injury (SCI). Methods: Following PRISMA recommendations, we searched randomized controlled trials that meets the inclusion criteria in PubMed Medline, Scopus, Web of Science and PEDro without language and publication date limitations. Methodological quality and risk of bias were evaluated using the PEDro scale. Results: Six RCTs providing data on 131 patients with SCI were included in this systematic review. Based on the information gathered from the included studies, both therapies can increase balance and functional status between pre- and post-assessment. However, it seems that there is a higher rate of improvement in balance and function in SCI patients in favor of the group that uses VRBT in their treatment (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Although there is evidence in favor of the effectiveness of VRBT in increasing balance and functional status in patients with SCI, this is limited, and further research is necessary. Even so, taking into account the results found, our systematic review suggests that VRBT provides an effective therapeutic use to implement alongside conventional therapies for patients with SCI.
Reference70 articles.
1. Anjum, A., Yazid, M.D., Daud, M.F., Idris, J., Hwei Ng, A.M., Naicker, A.S., Rashidah Ismail, O.H., Kumar, R.K.A., and Lokanathan, Y. (2020). Spinal Cord Injury: Pathophysiology, Multimolecular Interactions, and Underlying Recovery Mechanisms. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 21. 2. Bennett, J., Das, J.M., and Emmady, P.D. (2022). Spinal Cord Injuries, StatPearls Publishing. 3. Classifications in Brief: American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale;Roberts;Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.,2017 4. Khan, F.I., and Ahmed, Z. (2022). Experimental Treatments for Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cells, 11. 5. Spinal Cord Injury: A Review of Current Therapy, Future Treatments, and Basic Science Frontiers;Varma;Neurochem. Res.,2013
|
|