Limitations of Nature-Inspired Algorithms for Pricing on Digital Platforms

Author:

Sanchez-Cartas J. ManuelORCID,Sancristobal Ines P.

Abstract

Digital platforms have begun to rely more on algorithms to perform basic tasks such as pricing. These platforms must set prices that coordinate two or more sides that need each other in some way (e.g., developers and users or buyers and sellers). Therefore, it is essential to form correct expectations about how both sides behave. The purpose of this paper was to study the effect of different levels of information on two biology-inspired metaheuristics (differential evolution and particle swarm optimization algorithms) that were programmed to set prices on multisided platforms. We assumed that one platform always formed correct expectations (human platform) while the competitor always used a generic version of particle swarm optimization or differential evolution algorithms. We tested different levels of information that modified how expectations were formed. We found that both algorithms might end up in suboptimal solutions, showing that algorithms needed to account for expectation formation explicitly or risk setting nonoptimal prices. In addition, we found regularity in the way algorithms set prices when they formed incorrect expectations that can help practitioners detect cases in need of intervention.

Funder

the Scientific Committee of the PAAMS, DCAI, ISAMI, PACBB, MIS4TEL, BLOCKCHAIN & DECON International conferences

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Electrical and Electronic Engineering,Computer Networks and Communications,Hardware and Architecture,Signal Processing,Control and Systems Engineering

Reference30 articles.

1. Q-learning agents in a Cournot oligopoly model;Waltman;J. Econ. Dyn. Control,2008

2. Eschenbaum, N., Mellgren, F., and Zahn, P. (2022). Robust algorithmic collusion. arXiv.

3. Artificial Intelligence, algorithmic competition and market structures;Sanchez-Cartas;IEEE Access,2022

4. Artificial intelligence, algorithmic pricing, and collusion;Calvano;Am. Econ. Rev.,2020

5. Autonomous algorithmic collusion: Q-learning under sequential pricing;Klein;RAND J. Econ.,2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3