Resolving Agent Conflicts Using Enhanced Uncertainty Modeling Tools for Intelligent Decision Making

Author:

Zhai Yanhui12,Jia Zihan1,Li Deyu12

Affiliation:

1. School of Computer and Information Technology, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China

2. Key Laboratory of Computational Intelligence and Chinese Information Processing of Ministry of Education, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China

Abstract

Conflict analysis in intelligent decision making has received increasing attention in recent years. However, few researchers have analyzed conflicts by considering trustworthiness from the perspective of common agreement and common opposition. Since L-fuzzy three-way concept lattice is able to describe both the attributes that objects commonly possess and the attributes that objects commonly do not possess, this paper introduces an L-fuzzy three-way concept lattice to capture the issues on which agents commonly agree and the issues which they commonly oppose, and proposes a hybrid conflict analysis model. In order to resolve conflicts identified by the proposed model, we formulate the problem as a knapsack problem and propose a method for selecting the optimal attitude change strategy. This strategy takes into account the associated costs and aims to provide the decision maker with the most favorable decision in terms of resolving conflicts and reaching consensus. To validate the effectiveness and feasibility of the proposed model, a case study is conducted, providing evidence of the model’s efficacy and viability in resolving conflicts.

Funder

National Natural Science Foundation of China

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Electrical and Electronic Engineering,Computer Networks and Communications,Hardware and Architecture,Signal Processing,Control and Systems Engineering

Reference41 articles.

1. Conflict resolution using game theory and rough sets;Zia;Int. J. Intell. Syst.,2020

2. Multi-criteria large-scale group decision-making in linguistic contexts: A perspective of conflict analysis and resolution;Du;Group Decis. Negot.,2022

3. On conflicts;Pawlak;Int. J. Man–Mach. Stud.,1984

4. The selection of feasible strategies based on consistency measurement of cliques;Xu;Inf. Sci.,2022

5. An inquiry into anatomy of conflicts;Pawlak;Inf. Sci.,1998

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3