Outlier Detection by Energy Minimization in Quantized Residual Preference Space for Geometric Model Fitting
-
Published:2024-05-28
Issue:11
Volume:13
Page:2101
-
ISSN:2079-9292
-
Container-title:Electronics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Electronics
Author:
Zhang Yun1, Yang Bin1, Zhao Xi2, Wu Shiqian3ORCID, Luo Bin2, Zhang Liangpei2
Affiliation:
1. CNNC Wuhan Nuclear Power Operation Technology Co., Ltd., Wuhan 430223, China 2. The State Key Laboratory of Information Engineering in Surveying, Mapping and Remote Sensing, Wuhan University, Luo Jia Shan, Wuhan 430072, China 3. Institute of Robotics and Intelligent Systems (IRIS), Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430081, China
Abstract
Outliers significantly impact the accuracy of geometric model fitting. Previous approaches to handling outliers have involved threshold selection and scale estimation. However, many scale estimators assume that the inlier distribution follows a Gaussian model, which often does not accurately represent cases in geometric model fitting. Outliers, defined as points with large residuals to all true models, exhibit similar characteristics to high values in quantized residual preferences, thus causing outliers to cluster away from inliers in quantized residual preference space. In this paper, we leverage this consensus among outliers in quantized residual preference space by extending energy minimization to combine model error and spatial smoothness for outlier detection. The outlier detection process based on energy minimization follows an alternate sampling and labeling framework. Subsequently, an ordinary energy minimization method is employed to optimize inlier labels, thereby following the alternate sampling and labeling framework. Experimental results demonstrate that the energy minimization-based outlier detection method effectively identifies most outliers in the data. Additionally, the proposed energy minimization-based inlier segmentation accurately segments inliers into different models. Overall, the performance of the proposed method surpasses that of most state-of-the-art methods.
Reference51 articles.
1. Wong, H.S., Chin, T.J., Yu, J., and Suter, D. (2011, January 6–13). Dynamic and hierarchical multi-structure geometric model fitting. Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Vision, Barcelona, Spain. 2. Random sample consensus: A paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography;Fischler;Commun. ACM,1981 3. Choi, S., Kim, T., Yu, W., Choi, S., Kim, T., Yu, W., Choi, S., Kim, T., and Yu, W. (2009, January 7–10). Performance evaluation of RANSAC family. Proceedings of the British Machine Vision Conference, BMVC 2009, London, UK. 4. Vincent, E., and Laganiére, R. (2001, January 19–21). Detecting planar homographies in an image pair. Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Image and Signal Processing and Analysis. 5. Kanazawa, Y., and Kawakami, H. (2004, January 7–9). Detection of Planar Regions with Uncalibrated Stereo using Distributions of Feature Points. Proceedings of the BMVC, Kingston, UK.
|
|