Affiliation:
1. Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Oviedo, 33003 Oviedo, Spain
2. Polytechnic School of Engineering, University of Oviedo, 33003 Oviedo, Spain
3. Department of Mathematics, University of Oviedo, 33003 Oviedo, Spain
4. Business Development Iberia Northwest Area, Enel Green Power, 28014 Madrid, Spain
Abstract
The Spanish government is a strong advocate of reducing CO2 emissions and has made a clear commitment to the implementation of renewable energies. As reflected in Spain’s National Energy and Climate Plan (NECP), its objective is to double the current capacity of pumped hydropower storage (PHS) plants by 2030. Therefore, the study presented here is both current and forward-looking. This paper presents the results of the analysis of the technical potential of installing floating photovoltaic (FPV) plants at 25 PHS plants in Spain, i.e., the total capacity of Spanish hydropower plants. The study was conducted using various assessment indicators: the global horizontal irradiance ratio, electrical efficiency ratio, area required ratio, pumping area ratio, volume ratio of water pumped per day, and achievable power ratio. In summary, the following conclusions can be drawn: (i) The global horizontal irradiance ratio indicates whether a FPV plant is economically viable. From this point of view, the Aguayo PHS plant and the Tanes PHS plant are not suitable, as this ratio is very low; (ii) the compliance with the electrical efficiency ratio is flexible, and all hydropower plants meet this criterion; (iii) maximising the use of the assigned grid connection capacity is one of the goals sought by electrical companies when implementing FPV plants at existing PHS plants. The following hydropower plants are not suitable for the implementation of an FPV plant in view of the following: La Muela I, La Muela II, Aguayo, Sallente, Aldeadavila II, Moralets, Guillena, Bolarque II, Montamara, and IP; (iv) if the aim is energy storage, the following hydropower plants are not suitable for the implementation of an FPV plant: the La Muela I, La Muela II, Tajo de la Encantada, Aguayo, Sallente, Aldeadavila II, Conso, Moralets, Guillena, Bolarque II, Tanes, Montamara, Soutelo, Bao-Puente Bibey, Santiago de Jares, IP, and Urdiceto; (v) if the aim is to expand an FPV plant already installed at a PHS plant, the following hydropower plants do not meet this criterion: the La Muela I, La Muela II, Aguayo, Sallente, Aldeadavila, Moralets, Guillena, Bolarque II, Montamara, and IP. There are only eight hydropower plants that meet conditions (i), (iii) and (iv): the Villarino, Torrejon, Valparaiso, Gabriel y Galan, Guijo de Granadilla, Pintado, and Gobantes.
Reference61 articles.
1. United Nations (2023, December 10). Theme Report on Energy Transition. Available online: https://www.un.org/sites/un2.un.org/files/2021-twg_2-062321.pdf.
2. A review of floating photovoltaic installations: 2007–2013;Trapani;Prog. Photovolt. Res. Appl.,2015
3. World Bank Group (2023, December 10). Where Sun Meets Water: Floating Solar Market Report. Available online: https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/energy/publication/where-sun-meets-water.
4. (2023, December 10). IBERDROLA. Available online: https://www.iberdrola.com/innovation/floating-photovoltaic.
5. Design and construction of a test bench to investigate the potential of floating PV systems;Chalh;J. Clean. Prod.,2021
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献