Affiliation:
1. School for Technology and Logistics, Fontys University of Applied Science, 5912BG Venlo, The Netherlands
2. Faculty of Management, Science and Technology, Open University of the Netherlands, 6401DL Heerlen, The Netherlands
3. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Aalto University, 02150 Espoo, Finland
Abstract
Background: Additive manufacturing (AM) for patient-specific medical care products offers great opportunities. However, evidence about the supply chain (SC) performance impact based on empirical data is limited. Methods: In this case study, we gathered real-life data about a traditional manufacturing orthopedic shoe SC and developed future scenarios in which AM is introduced at various points and with different degrees of penetration in the SC. Results: Presently, AM can only replace traditional manufacturing of tools and shoe components at a higher total cost. However, with maturing technology, the complete AM production of orthopedic shoes is expected to become feasible. Theoretically, that could disrupt existing SCs, eliminating 70% of the SC steps, improving SC lead time by 90%, and altering SC relations. However, certain thresholds currently prevent disruption. Specifically, the AM of complete orthopedic shoes has to become possible, manufacturing prices have to drop, and traditional craftsmanship has to be integrated into the digital product design. Conclusions: A framework for transition pathways, including directions for future research, is formed. Findings provide valuable insights for scholars and decision makers in the patient-specific products industry, health insurance providers, and healthcare policy makers to be better prepared by adjusting SC designs, relationships, and remuneration programs while AM technology develops towards maturity.
Funder
Academy of Finland
Fontys University of Applied Sciences
Reference100 articles.
1. Defining Supply Chain Management;Mentzer;J. Bus. Logist.,2001
2. Chopra, S., and Meindl, P. (2013). Supply Chain Management Strategy, Planning, and Operation, Global Edition, Pearson. [5th ed.].
3. APICS (2024, April 01). Supply Chain Operating Reference (SCOR) Model. Available online: http://www.apics.org/apics-for-business/frameworks/scor.
4. Schwab, K. (2017). The Fourth Industrial Revolution, Random House USA Inc.
5. (2015). Additive Manufacturing—General Principles—Terminology (Standard No. ISO/ASTM 52900: 2015 (ASTM F2792)).